基于PV-GPG模型的科研诚信管理政策文本分析  

Analysis of Research Integrity Management Policy Text Based on PV-GPG Model

作　　者：李利军[1] 任垚 李艳丽[1] 曹永新 Li Lijun;Ren Yao;Li Yanli;Cao Yongxin(Shijiazhuang Tiedao University,Shijiazhuang 050043,China)

机构地区：[1]石家庄铁道大学,河北石家庄050043

出　　处：《科技创业月刊》2023年第11期59-65,共7页Journal of Entrepreneurship in Science & Technology

基　　金：河北省省级科技计划软科学研究专项“科研诚信分类评价与监管体系建设研究”(22556203D)。

摘　　要：科研诚信是科技创新的基石,是实施创新驱动发展战略的坚实基础。利用以公共价值为基础的政府绩效治理(PV-GPG)模型和扎根理论的编码技术,分析25个省份公布的29份科研诚信管理政策文件,研究科研诚信管理领域面临的挑战与困境。研究发现,科研诚信管理存在信用修复机制不完善、宣传教育力度薄弱、管理对象细分过度、分级分类评价难等问题,并据此提出相关建议。研究结论有助于深化对科研诚信管理机制的理解,并为科研诚信制度建设与管理提供参考。As the cornerstone of scientific and technological innovation,scientific research integrity is the solid foundation for the implementation of the innovation driven developme-nt strategy.Using the Public Value-Based Government Performance Governance(PV-GPG)model and the coding technique of Rooted Theory,the article analyzes 29 research integrity management policy documents issued by 25 provinces,aiming to study the challenges and dilemmas faced by China in the field of scientific research integrity management.The study finds that China’s sientific research integrity management gets stuck in imperfect credit repair mechanism,weak publicity and education,excessive subdivision of management objects,and difficulty in highlighting hierarchical classification and evaluation.And finally this paper puts forward relevant suggestions accordingly.The findings of this paper hel-p to deepen the intrinsic understanding of scientific research integrity management mechanism and bring useful practical insights for local governments.

关 键 词：科研诚信 PV-GPG 公共价值 文本分析 

分 类 号：G311[文化科学]