明代两淮盐区天赐场置废始末考论--以地方志资料为中心  

Examinations on the Establishment and Abolishment of Tiancichang in the Ming Dynasty Huainan and Huaibei Salt-Production Area from Start to End--Centered Around Local Records Reference Materials

作　　者：徐应桃 张晓绿 Xu Yingtao;Zhang Xiaolv

机构地区：[1]上海师范大学人文学院历史系

出　　处：《中国地方志》2023年第5期80-90,M0006,共12页China Local Records

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“7—20世纪长江三角洲海岸带环境变迁史料的搜集、整理与研究”(项目编号:20&ZD231)阶段性成果。

摘　　要：明代两淮盐区天赐场置废时间在各方志中记载不一,相关史料信息又与两浙崇明天赐场混淆,致使诸多研究引用讹文。现通过考证,否定成化年间置两浙崇明天赐场之说,确认实际所置为两淮天赐场,并进一步指出两淮天赐场始置于成化七年,奏革于正德十三年,该场的设立是为了在两淮盐业日益萧条的境况下增加盐产,裁场则受商困、课乏、丁少等因素的驱动。There were different records on the time of establishment and abolishment of Tiancichang in the Ming Dynasty Huainan and Huaibei salt-production area in various local records.Related historical information are often mixed up with Chongming Tiancichang that belonged to Zhexi and Zhedong,leading to erroneous quotations in many researches.Through examinations,the theory that Chongming Tiancichang of Zhexi and Zhedong was established during the Reign of Chenghua was disqualified,and it can be confirmed that what was actually established was Tiancichang of Huainan and Huaibei.We further pointed out that Tiancichang of Huainan and Huaibei was first established in the seventh year of the Reign of Chenghua,and the request for abolishment was presented to the emperor on the 13thyear of the Reign of Zhengde.The establishment was meant to increase salt production under the circumstances that the salt industry was caught in deeper and deeper depression,and the abolishment was driven by factors such as commercial difficulties,lack of taxation sources,and lack of laborers.

关 键 词：两淮盐区 天赐场 兴置 奏革 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学] K248[历史地理—中国史]