论《民法典》网络侵权中“及时”的认定  

On the determination of"timeliness"in Internet copyright infringement of the Civil Code

作　　者：张印 ZHANG Yin(School of Law,Beijing Normal University,Beijing 100875,China)

机构地区：[1]北京师范大学法学院,北京100875

出　　处：《河南工程学院学报（社会科学版）》2023年第4期54-62,共9页Journal of Henan University of Engineering(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：2023年北京师范大学法学院学术型研究生专项科研基金课题(2023LAW024)。

摘　　要：《民法典》网络侵权条文建构起通知转送、必要措施和终止措施的“及时”义务体系。“及时”的认定应考量网络服务提供者、网络用户、权利人三者之间的互动关系,确立过错责任分配、利益合谋理论和诚实善意标准三大原则。“及时”认定的衡量因素包括通知效度、侵权类型和管理能力。从合格通知、瑕疵通知到错误通知,“及时”认定的宽缓性逐渐增强。网络知识产权领域、人格权领域、财产权领域则以其性质、特征差异而对“及时”认定产生不同程度的影响。“及时”认定原则和衡量因素的明确,能够有效平衡权利人和网络服务提供者的利益关系,从而实现权利人权益保护和互联网产业持续健康发展。Internet copyright infringement provisions of the Civil Code establish a"timeliness"obligation system for notification transmission,necessary measures,and termination measures.The determination of"timeliness"should consider the interactive relationship between internet service providers,network users and rights holders,and establish three principles:fault liability distribution,profit collusion theory,and the standard of honesty and good faith.The measurement factors for"timeliness"determination include notification validity,infringement type and management ability.From qualified notification,defect notification to error notification,the flexibility of"timeliness"determination is gradually increasing.The fields of network intellectual property,personality rights and property rights have varying degrees of impact on"timeliness"determination due to their differences in nature and characteristics.The interaction between the principle of"timeliness"determination and measurement factors can effectively balance the interests of rights holders and internet service providers,thereby achieving the rights protection of rights holders and the sustainable and healthy development of the internet industry.

关 键 词：《民法典》 网络服务提供者 “及时” 侵权类型 通知效度 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]