中外体育素养评价体系对比及启示  

Comparison and Insights from Physical Literacy Assessment Systems between China and Foreign Countries

作　　者：费永昌 王鹏[1] Fei Yongchang;Wang Peng(Hunan University of Science and Technology,Xiangtan 411100,China)

机构地区：[1]湖南科技大学,湖南湘潭411100

出　　处：《体育科技文献通报》2023年第11期110-113,133,共5页Bulletin of Sport Science & Technology

摘　　要：采用文献资料法,对比加拿大、美国、澳大利亚的体育素养评价体系。结果发现:加拿大的评价体系信度较高,评价内容更为全面;美国围绕国家体育课程标准进行构建,更符合本国实际需求;澳大利亚对青少年评价指标所处阶段有清晰的分类,有助于学生清楚地了解自身水平。我国体育素养评价体系对于个体身体层面的评价更为详细,但情感社会方面的评价仍有不足。从归纳各国优点中得出如下启示:进一步将Physical Literacy的概念本土化;完善我国体育素养评价理论体系内容;围绕我国体育学科核心素养进行构建;家庭、学校、社会加强协调配合以发挥出综合作用。Employing a literature review methodology,this study conducts a comparative analysis of the physical literacy assessment systems in Canada,the United States,and Australia.The results reveal that Canada's assessment system boasts high reliability and a more comprehensive scope of evaluation,the U.S.system is constructed around national physical education standards,aligning with the country's practical needs,and Australia exhibits a clear categorization of assessment indicators for youth,enabling students to gain a clear understanding of their proficiency levels.While China's assessment system provides detailed evaluations of individual physical aspects,it falls short in assessing emotional and social dimensions.Insights for China,drawn from synthesizing the strengths of various countries,include further localization of the concept of Physical Literacy,refinement of the theoretical content in China's physical literacy assessment system,construction around the core competencies of the discipline of physical education in China,and the reinforcement of coordination among families,schools,and society.

关 键 词：体育素养 评价体系 加拿大 美国 澳大利亚 启示 

分 类 号：G81[文化科学—体育学]