检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘显 LIU Xian(School of Literature,Jiaying University,Meizhou 514015,China)
出 处:《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2024年第1期189-195,共7页Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金冷门绝学和国别史等研究专项(19VJX128)。
摘 要:《中华道藏》所录敦煌道经或可弥补文献记载之不足,反映河西道教发展的状况;或可存佚补缺、纠谬辨伪,解决道教研究中一些悬而难决的问题,具有极高的研究价值。但由于敦煌文献整理工作专业性很强《,中华道藏》又成于众手,其所录敦煌道经中难免会存在一些文字和标点问题,影响读者的阅读使用。兹通过覆核敦煌写本真迹,对其中25则录文试作订补,为一家之见,供《中华道藏》异日修订时参考。The Dunhuang Daoist scriptures recorded in Daoist Canon of China may make up for the shortcom‐ings in literature records and reflect the development of Daoism in Hexi.Alternatively,they can be used to preserve and supplement the lost,correct the errors and distinguish the falsehood,and settle some unresolved and difficult problems in Daoism research.In this regard,they have extremely high research value.While the compilation of Dunhuang literature demands the highly professional knowledge,Daoist Canon of China are actually completed by a few proofreaders.Hence,some textual and punctuation mistakes will be inevitable in the Dunhuang Daoist scriptures included in Daoist Canon of China,hindering the readers from reading and using them.Through reviewing the authentic Dunhuang manuscripts,the supplements are made to the 25 recordings according to the individual knowledge,so as to provide reference for the future revision of Daoist Canon of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.213.54