“湖桑”原生形态与次生形态问题考述  

Primary Morph and Secondary Morph of“Huzhou Mulberry”

作　　者：祝玉芳[1] 李学功 ZHU Yufang;LI Xuegong(Library,Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000,China;Huzhou Development Research Institute,Huzhou University,Huzhou 313000,China)

机构地区：[1]湖州师范学院图书馆,浙江湖州313000 [2]湖州师范学院湖州发展研究院,浙江湖州313000

出　　处：《湖州师范学院学报》2023年第11期23-27,共5页Journal of Huzhou University

摘　　要：史学的合理性与历史的真实性,始终有如一对矛盾纽结,二者既在对立中碰撞、修正,又在统一中调适、融合。“湖桑”问题亦可作如是观。过去,在人们旧有的知识建构中,“湖桑”之种源、种属似乎是一个不成其为问题的问题。但从知识重构与知识发现出发,“湖桑”确乎存在着一个原生形态的湖桑与次生形态的湖桑之源与流的知识拷问。The rationality of historiography and the authenticity of history are always like a pair of contradictory knots,both of which collide and revise in opposition,but also adjust and merge in unity.The issue of“Huzhou mulberry”can also be viewed in the same way.In the past,in people’s previous knowledge construction,the origin and species of“Huzhou mulberry”seemed to be an unproblematic issue.However,from the perspective of knowledge reconstruction and knowledge discovery,“Huzhou mulberry”does differ from a primary form as the sourcetoa secondary form as the branch.

关 键 词：湖桑 原生形态 次生形态 

分 类 号：K872[历史地理—考古学及博物馆学]