欧洲人权法院判决中权利冲突的存在与本质  

On the Existence and Nature of Conflicts Between Human Rights at the European Court of Human Rights

作　　者： 范继增(译) Stijin Smet;Fan Jizeng

机构地区：[1]比利时哈尔赛特大学法学院 [2]山东工商学院法学院 [3]四川大学欧洲问题研究中心

出　　处：《人权》2023年第5期183-208,共26页Human Rights

摘　　要：人权冲突问题持续地困扰法学理论和人权实践。在法学理论领域,有些学者否认不同权利之间存在真正的冲突。尤其是信仰康德主义的法学理论者们致力于构建和谐与消除冲突的权利体系。有时,不同的权利形成冲突的观念会在人权实践中被摒弃。欧洲人权法院在部分判决中暗示了不存在人权冲突。但是,更多的欧洲人权法院审判实践则是完全接受了人权冲突的存在。在无法消除法律困惑和不确定性的情境下,笔者依托对欧洲人权法院判例的分析,对人权冲突的存在和本质提出了新的理论观点。Conflicts between human rights continue to trouble both legal theory and human rights practice.In legal theory,some deny the very existence of conflicts between rights.Kantian theorists,in particular,strive to render rights systems harmonious and devoid of conflict.The thought that human rights might clash with each other has been a cause for occasional pause in human rights practice as well.The European Court of Human Rights,in particular,has at times hinted at the impossibility of human rights conflicts.But more often than not,the Court uncritically accepts the existence of human rights conflicts in its adjudicatory practice.In this context of legal confusion and uncertainty,this article puts forth a theoretical argument on the existence and nature of conflicts between human rights.The article's argument is developed against the analytical backdrop provided by the case law of the Court.

关 键 词：人权冲突 人权规范 法学理论 欧洲人权公约 欧洲人权法院 

分 类 号：D998.2[政治法律—国际法学]