再论唐代墓志书写中的权葬与迁葬  

Rediscussing Quanzang and Qianzang in the Epitaph Writing of the Tang Dynasty

作　　者：刘琴丽 LIU Qinli(Institute of Ancient History/Dunhuang Research Center,CASS,Beijing 100101,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院古代史研究所/敦煌学研究中心,北京100101

出　　处：《山西大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第6期74-79,共6页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“中古时期德政碑考论”(21FZSB043)。

摘　　要：唐代墓志书写中与权葬概念相近的权殡、权厝等词,并非都指临时安葬,迁葬也并非都是二次安葬,这涉及古代丧礼在唐代的延续和变迁。唐代墓志书写中古礼的殡(停柩待葬)和变礼的殡(安葬)同时并存,故权殡、权厝于私宅的墓志书写有些实则是对丧礼中殡期的描述,但现实研究中却常会被误解为临时安葬。唐人将停殡期书写为权殡、权厝、权窀,或省略殡期书写,将正式安葬称为迁葬、迁祔,这类墓志用语现象当与丧礼中停殡、启殡的仪式有关,因为殡期要在正寝掘地下棺或在丛聚于棺材外面的木材上涂泥,正式安葬时再将棺柩从殡地移出,迁祔墓地。According to the textual research,Quanbin,Quancuo and the like which are conceptually similar to Quanzang in the epitaph of the Tang Dynasty,do not always refer to temporary burial,and Qianzang(the relocated burial) is not always the second burial,which involves the continuation and change of the ancient funeral ceremony.In Tang Dynasty epitaph,the ancient rite Bin(laying the coffin for burial) and the irregular rite Bin(burial) coexisted at the same time.Therefore,some epitaph writing about Quanbin or Quancuo at home is actually the description of coffin staying session before burial,but it is often misunderstood as temporary burial in practical studies.The Tang people wrote this period of time as Quanbin,Quancuo,Quanzhun,or just omitted it,and the formal burial as Qianzang or Qianfu,which might be related to the funeral ceremony,because the funeral ceremony involves digging the ground of the mainhall for laying the coffin or smearing mud on the wood clumped around the coffin.At the time of formal burial,the coffin would be removed from the place where the coffin was laid.

关 键 词：唐代 书写 墓志 权葬 迁葬 

分 类 号：K242[历史地理—历史学] K892.98[历史地理—中国史]