检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:詹晓庆 郑喜兰 王继伟 杨念 蔡久梅 任敏敏 谢铭 ZHAN Xiaoqing;ZHENG Xilan;WANG Jiwei;YANG Nian;CAI Jiumei;REN Minmin;XIE Ming
机构地区:[1]遵义医科大学附属医院消化病医院普外科,遵义市563000 [2]贵州医科大学护理学院 [3]遵义医科大学护理学院
出 处:《中华护理杂志》2023年第23期2920-2928,共9页Chinese Journal of Nursing
基 金:2023年度贵州省卫生健康委科学技术基金项目(gzwkj2023-154)。
摘 要:目的系统评价社会心理干预对减重手术患者健康状况的干预效果。方法计算机检索PubMed、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library、Clinic Trials、PsycInfo、中国生物医学文献数据库、中国知网、万方数据库、维普数据库以及中外临床试验注册中心,检索社会心理干预对减重手术患者健康状况影响的随机对照试验,检索时限均为从建库至2022年9月15日。由2名研究者进行质量评价,采用RevMan 5.3软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入23项研究,Meta分析结果显示,社会心理干预能改善患者情绪化饮食和暴饮暴食行为[SMD=-0.44,95%CI(-0.78,-0.09),P=0.010;MD=-5.88,95%CI(-8.65,-3.11),P<0.001],提高患者的生活质量[SMD=0.30,95%CI(0.02,0.59),P=0.040],缓解患者的焦虑和抑郁情绪[SMD=-0.37,95%CI(-0.67,-0.08),P=0.010;SMD=-0.59,95%CI(-0.84,-0.33),P<0.001],但在改善进食障碍方面效果不明显,差异无统计学意义[MD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.19,0.18),P=0.950]。不同干预措施和随访时间的亚组分析结果显示,试验组与对照组在体重变化方面差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论社会心理干预能改善减重手术患者的心理状态及饮食行为,提高患者的生活质量,但在进食障碍和体重变化方面干预效果尚不明确,仍需开展更多高质量的临床研究进一步验证。Objective To systematically evaluate the intervention effect of social psychological intervention on the health status of patients with bariatric surgery(BS).Methods 8 databases,including PubMed,PsycInfo,and Embase and Clinic Trials,were retrieved to recruit randomized controlled trials with computer from database establishing time to Sep.2022.Independent quality evaluation was conducted by 2 researchers,and Meta-analysis was performed by the RevMan5.3 software.Results Totally 23 RCTs were included.The meta-analysis showed that psychosocial interventions in BS patients improve emotional eating and binge eating behavior[SMD=-0.44,95%CI(-0.78,-0.09),P=0.010;MD=-5.88,95%CI(-8.65,-3.11),P<0.001],promote better quality of life[SMD=0.30,95%CI(0.02,0.59),P=0.040]and physical mobility,alleviates anxiety and depression[SMD=-0.37,95%CI(-0.67,-0.08),P=0.010;SMD=-0.59,95%CI(-0.84,-0.33),P<0.001].However,the effect on improving eating disorders[MD=-0.01,95%CI(-0.19,0.18),P=0.950]is not significant,and subgroup analysis results of different intervention measures and follow-up times showed that there was no statistically significant difference in weight changes between the social psychological intervention group and the control group.Conclusion Psychosocial intervention can effectively improve the mental state and eating behavior of the bariatric surgery patients,improve the quality of life and increase physical activity of patients.However,the effect of intervention on eating disorder and weight change is still unclear.More high-quality clinical studies need to be carried out for further verification.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7