如何快速有效地答复审查意见  

How to Quickly and Effectively Reply to Office Action

作　　者：赵令令 ZHAO Lingling(Patent Search and Consultation Center of CNIPA,Beijing 100083,China)

机构地区：[1]国家知识产权局专利检索咨询中心,北京100083

出　　处：《科技创新与生产力》2023年第11期19-22,共4页Sci-tech Innovation and Productivity

摘　　要：申请人或专利权人在提交意见陈述书答复新颖性或创造性的审查意见时,往往由于缺乏专利法相关背景知识,无法快速有效地答复审查员的审查意见。本文基于《中华人民共和国专利法》对于新颖性和创造性的规定以及审查员在判断专利申请是否具备新颖性、创造性的判断方法出发,结合具体审查实例,说明如何可以与审查员针对发明创造的审查意见进行快速有效的沟通。When the applicant or patentee submits arguments about the rejections on novelty or creativity,sometimes they often lack the relevant background knowledge of the patent law and do not know how to effectively reply to the examiner's examination opinion.This paper is based on the provisions of the"Patent Law of the People's Republic of China"on novelty and creativity and the examiner's judgment method in determining whether the patent application possesses novelty and/or creativity,combining with specific examination examples,this paper explains how to quickly and effectively communicate with the examiner's examination opinions on inventions and creations.

关 键 词：新颖性 创造性 审查意见 意见陈述 专利申请 

分 类 号：G306[文化科学]