检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张奇林[1] 孙蔚 Zhang Qilin;Sun Wei
机构地区:[1]武汉大学社会保障研究中心,湖北武汉430072
出 处:《中州学刊》2023年第12期86-90,共5页Academic Journal of Zhongzhou
基 金:教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目“共同富裕目标下第三次分配的理论建构与实现路径研究”(22JJD630016);国家社会科学基金项目“慈善的第三次分配效应与机制优化研究”(21CGL059);贵州省孔学堂发展基金会资助研究项目。
摘 要:基金会系统是接收社会捐赠最多的慈善主体。作为第三次分配的一个重要载体,基金会的发展有助于完善收入分配制度,全面推进共同富裕。基金会是混合组织,公益逻辑和市场逻辑(资产管理逻辑)是基金会的底层逻辑,普遍影响各种类型的基金会运行。不同类型的基金会在不同的制度环境下形成了差异性的特定逻辑。基于多重制度逻辑理论,剖析基金会底层逻辑和特定逻辑之间的冲突,有利于捋清困扰基金会可持续发展的使命漂移、基金保值增值等问题产生的原因及其对不同类型基金会的影响,进而从制度环境和组织层面提出相应的治理策略。The foundation system is the charitable entity that receives the most social donations.As an important carrier of the third distribution,the development of foundations helps to improve the income distribution system and comprehensively promote common prosperity.Foundations are hybrid organizations.Public welfare logic and market logic(asset management logic)are the underlying logic of foundations,which generally affect the operation of various types of foundations.Different types of foundations have formed differentiated specific logic in different institutional environments.Based on the theory of multiple institutional logic,this article analyzes the conflict between the underlying logic and the specific logic of foundations,clarify the reasons for mission drift,value preservation and appreciation that have puzzled the healthy and sustainable development of foundations,and their impact on different types of foundations,and then propose corresponding governance strategies from the institutional environment and organizational levels.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7