检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:石晓宁[1] SHI Xiao-ning(Department of Languages,Literatures and Linguistics,York University,Toronto M3J 1P3,Canada)
机构地区:[1]约克大学语言、文学与语言学系,加拿大多伦多M2R 2X8
出 处:《华侨华人历史研究》2023年第4期67-75,共9页Journal of Overseas Chinese History Studies
摘 要:论文以北京政府外交部、加拿大移民局等档案资料为基础,梳理了加拿大人头税法案的衰微以及《中加移民条约》提出的过程;分析了中国南北政局对中加订约交涉、排华法案制定的影响以及中国领事的订约努力与华社反对排华法案的抗争。加政府率先提出两国订约,却在1923年选择全面排华,这一历史转弯是加拿大朝野长期种族歧视、主张“白色加拿大”的必然,而中国南北对峙的局势又为其提供了外在藉端。《中加移民条约》是双边平等协商解决加拿大华人移民问题的正途之一。订约交涉虽以失利告终,但北京政府外交部与驻加拿大的中国领事们为维护国家尊严,坚持平等订约、维护华侨权益的努力值得缅怀。Using archival material,this paper looks into the diminishing influence of the previous Chinese Immigration Act and the making of China-Canada Immigration Agreement.The latter involved negotiations between the Canadian Federal Government and the Chinese Governments in both Beijing and Guangzhou.The negotiation was initiated by the Canadian Government,which however switched to fully restrict Chinese immigration from 1923.Ottawa's change,on the one hand,may be because of constant racial prejudice prevailing in the society of “white Canada”.On the other hand,the conflict between two rival Chinese governments may have contributed an additional factor leading the Canadian Government to reverse.To date,research on negotiations concerning the China-Canada Immigration Agreement is still scant.The present study is a revisit to Chinese Canadian history especially focusing on Chinese diplomats of the Beiyang Government.Their endeavor to defend China's national interest and overseas Chinese rights deserve to be remembered.
关 键 词:加拿大 中加移民条约 排华法案 人头税 领事保护
分 类 号:D634.371.1[政治法律—政治学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.218.204