检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑延谱[1] 朱珠[1] 刘子良 Zheng Yanpu;Zhu Zhu;Liu Ziliang(Law School of Beijing Normal University,Beijing,100875)
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2023年第4期14-21,共8页Journal of Shandong Police College
摘 要:受人民警察身份特殊性的影响,理论界与实务界对警务辅助人员能否成为袭警罪的行为对象存在较大争议。以职务为中心的解释立场固然能够实现对所有警务人员的周全保护,但无论是与人民警察的规范语义,还是与职务的行为概念,职务说都难以实现契合,并有引发刑法内部龃龉和部门法间相抵牾的隐患。唯有审视警察管理制度和警察公务属性,回归人民警察的身份标签,方能避免法规范之间的语境鸿沟,实现彼此价值贯通,切实实现对警务人员法益保护的袭警罪立法初衷。Influenced by the particularity of the identity of the people’s police,there is a great controversy in both theoretical and practical fields on whether the auxiliary police can become the object of the crime of assaulting police.Although duty-centered interpretation can realize the better protection of all police officers,it is difficult to achieve the agreement with the standard meaning of the people’s police or the concept of duty,and there is also a hidden risk of causing internal discord within criminal law and contradiction between departmental laws.Only by examining the police management system and the attributes of the police can we avoid the contextual gap between the legal norms,realize the integration of each other’s functions,and effectively realize the original intention of the legislation on the crime of assaulting police to protect the legal interests of police officers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.174.90