商业间谍行为刑法规制的若干问题研究  

Research on Some Problems of Criminal Law Regulation of Commercial Espionage

作　　者：刘坤 LIU Kun

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院大学 [2]天津市人民检察院知识产权检察办公室

出　　处：《经贸法律评论》2023年第6期101-115,共15页Business and Economic Law Review

摘　　要：《刑法修正案(十一)》针对商业间谍行为增设了“为境外窃取、刺探、收买、非法提供商业秘密罪”,此次修改虽解决了商业间谍行为刑法规制的“现实之痛”“立法之殇”,符合“入罪之理”,但仍存在目的犯与行为犯之争、双重明知认定之争、境外组织性质之争、行为方式认定争议及行为对象界限混同等现实问题。在《刑法修正案(十一)》规定的基础上,借鉴美国《反经济间谍法》及相关判例的立法、裁判经验,从商业间谍行为的行为方式、服务对象、行为对象及责任形式等方面进行深入分析,并对本罪与侵犯商业秘密罪以及为境外窃取、刺探、收买、非法提供国家秘密、情报罪之间的界分作了论述,以期解决司法认定中的实践难题。The Criminal Law Amendment(XI) added the crime of “stealing,spying,buying and illegally providing trade secrets for overseas”.Although this amendment has solved the “real pain” and “legislative pain” of the criminal law regulation of commercial espionage,and is in line with the “principle of incrimination”,but there are still various realistic problems,such as disputes between intent crime and behavior crime,double knowing identification,and the nature of overseas organizations about the identification of behavior mode and the confusion of behavior object boundaries.On the basis of the provisions of the Amendment to the Criminal Law(XI),drawing on the legislative and judicial experience of the Anti Economic Espionage Act of the United States and relevant precedents,this paper makes an in-depth analysis of the behavior mode,service object,behavior object and liability form of commercial espionage,and discusses the boundaries between this crime and the crime of infringing on commercial secrets,and the crime of stealing,spying,buying,illegally providing state secrets and information for foreign countries,in order to solve the practical problems in judicial identification.

关 键 词：商业间谍 双重明知 刑法规制 司法认定 

分 类 号：D924.399[政治法律—刑法学]