检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韩乔亚 赵楠 Han Qiaoya;Zhao Nan
机构地区:[1]北京市高级人民法院干部处 [2]中国政法大学法学院 [3]北京市高级人民法院民三庭 [4]中国政法大学民商经济法学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第4期1-5,共5页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:合法来源抗辩制度属于民事抗辩制度的一种,系知识产权侵权纠纷案件中当事人常用的抗辩事由之一,旨在平衡知识产权权利人与善意销售者之间的利益。司法实践中,合法来源抗辩事由成立的案件并非很多,导致合法来源抗辩事由难以成立的原因主要在于当事人不能提交有利证据,以及司法机关在判断合法来源抗辩的主观要件和客观要件时存在不同的意见。在具体案件审理中,应不断分析、总结、认定合法来源抗辩的考量因素,正确把握合法来源抗辩的裁判尺度。The legal source defense system belongs to a kind of civil defense system,which is one of the common defense reasons of the parties in intellectual property infringement disputes,aiming at balancing the interests between the intellectual property right holder and the bona-fide seller.In judicial practice,there are not many cases in which the defense of legal source is established.The main reasons why it is difficult to establish the defense of legal source are that the parties cannot submit favorable evidence and the judicial organs have different opinions when judging the subjective and objective elements of the defense of legal source.In the trial of specific cases,we should constantly analyze and summarize the factors to determine the defense of legal source,and correctly grasp the judgment yardstick of legal source defense.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.15.27.146