民事强制执行程序中执行回转问题探究——兼评《民事强制执行法(草案)》第91条  

Research on the Execution Reversal in Civil Enforcement Procedures——Comments on Article 91 of the Draft Civil Enforcement Law

作　　者：程玲 吴国建[2] Cheng Ling;Wu Guojian

机构地区：[1]江苏省丹阳市人民法院指挥中心 [2]江苏省丹阳市人民法院

出　　处：《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第4期23-28,共6页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：《中华人民共和国民事强制执行法(草案)》(以下简称《草案》)已由最高人民法院提请全国人大常委会审议。《草案》中关于执行回转的4条规定稍显笼统。一些国家比如德国、韩国,还有我国台湾地区并未设置执行回转制度,相关理论专家、学者及实务人士对于涉及执行回转方面的研究亦十分有限,这就给司法实务带来了一定难度。执行回转可看作“再执行”,也是独立的执行程序,在程序和实体上都需要正当、合法。民事强制执行实践中涉执行回转相关问题,尚不能够在《草案》第91条至第94条规定中找到较为理想的解决方案。The Civil Enforcement Law of the People's Republic of China(Draft)(hereinafter referred to as the Draft)has been submitted by the Supreme People's Court to the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress for deliberation.The four provisions of the Draft on execution reversal are somewhat general.Some foreign countries such as Germany,South Korea,and Taiwan have not set up the execution reversal system,and the relevant theoretical experts,scholars and practitioners have limited research and works on the execution reversal,which brings certain difficulties to judicial practice.Execution reversal can be regarded as"re-execution",and it is also an independent execution procedure,which needs to be legitimate and legal in procedure and entity.In the practice of civil enforcement,it is still difficult to find an ideal solution in articles 91 to 94 of the Draft.

关 键 词：执行回转 执行程序 孳息 执行费 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]