检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周文阁 Zhou Wenge
机构地区:[1]西北政法大学刑事法学院
出 处:《北京政法职业学院学报》2023年第4期99-106,共8页Journal of Beijing College of Politics and Law
摘 要:基于侵犯公民个人信息罪的情节犯属性,确定“情节严重”的标准是本罪罪与非罪的界限。立足于《个人信息保护法》新修订的背景,在法秩序统一视野下对侵犯公民个人信息罪的情节严重标准进行重新界定,着重于信息分层保护机制,突出对敏感个人信息的重点保护、对未成年人信息的特殊保护以及互联网经营主体的特殊监管职责,出罪路径一是知情同意的授权许可,二是“情境脉络”的判断方法排除合理的信息利用行为,对滥用信息行为需入罪处理。Based on the attribute of the crime of infringement of citizens'personal information,the standard of"aggravating circumstances"is determined as the boundary between this crime and decriminalization.Based on the background of the new revision of the Personal Information Protection Law,the aggravating circumstances of the crime of infringing citizens'personal information is redefined under the unified vision of the legal order,focusing on the mechanism of layered protection of information,highlighting the key protection of sensitive personal information,the special protection of minors'information and the special supervisory duties of Internet business entities.The path of incrimination is firstly the authorization of informed consent;and secondly the"contextual context"approach excludes reasonable use of information and criminalizes misuse of information.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.206.240