网络平台权力的异化风险与规制方案  

Alienation risk and regulation scheme of network platform power

作　　者：王玉薇 王田 WANG Yu-wei;WANG Tian(Grammar school,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin 150040,China)

机构地区：[1]东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040

出　　处：《哈尔滨师范大学社会科学学报》2023年第5期59-64,共6页Journal of Social Science of Harbin Normal University

基　　金：黑龙江省哲学社会科学研究规划项目“大数据时代算法致害可责机制的法治化研究”(20FXB 125);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目“中国式基层治理中‘数字公民’权利的法治保障研究”(2572022DE08)。

摘　　要：网络平台因资源和地位上的非对等性,产生了管理用户的“准立法权”、“准执法权”和“准司法权”等权力,但权力的异化逐渐偏离了服务于公共利益的价值预设,造成对自由、公正、中立等法律价值的冲击,给网络平台权力异化风险规制带来新的挑战。为此需要构建网络平台“准立法权”补足的沟通商谈机制,完善网络平台“准执法权”运行的程序性规范,建立裁判中立的“众议式”纠纷解决机制,从而更好规制网络平台权力的异化风险。Due to the non-equivalence of resources and status,network platforms have generated“quasi-legislative power”,“quasi-enforcement power”and“quasi-judicial power”to manage users,but the alienation of power has gradually deviated from the value presupposition of serving the public interest,resulting in an impact on legal values such as freedom,justice and neutrality,and bringing new challenges to the regulation of power alienation risk of network platforms.To this end,it is necessary to build a communication and negotiation mechanism that is supplemented by“quasi-legislative power”of the network platform,improve the procedural norms for the operation of“quasi-enforcement power”of the network platform,and establish a“crowd discussion”dispute resolution mechanism with neutral judgment,so as to better regulate the risk of alienation of power of the network platform.

关 键 词：网络平台权力 网络平台权力异化 准立法权 准执法权 准司法权 

分 类 号：D920.0[政治法律—法学]