村委会单位犯罪主体问题研究——以非法占用耕地为例  

A Study on the Problem of Unit Criminal Subjects of Village Committee— Taking the Illegal Occupation of Arable Land as an Example

作　　者：田野 张长春 徐磊 顾英姿 Tian Ye;Zhang Changchun;Xu Lei;Gu Yingzi(College of Humanities and Social Sciences;College of Land and Resources,Hebei Agricultural University,Baoding 071001)

机构地区：[1]河北农业大学人文社会科学学院,保定071001 [2]河北农业大学国土资源学院,保定071001

出　　处：《西部学刊》2023年第23期103-106,111,共5页Journal of Western

基　　金：2022年度河北省社会科学发展研究课题“燕山—太行山地区实现脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有效衔接及转型路径研究”(编号:20220303087)有关成果。

摘　　要：在司法实践中,一些地方的村委会为谋取经济利益,非法占用耕地进行非农活动。村委会是否可以成立单位犯罪争议很大,各地判决结果也不统一,主要存在肯定说、否定说和折中说三种不同的裁判思路。村委会单位犯罪的司法认定不能完全否定村委会成立单位犯罪,还应当作实质意义上的判断,使用交叉视角,将刑法总则、分则以及刑法解释三者有机结合起来进行综合认定。In judicial practice,village committees in some places illegally occupy arable land for non-agricultural activities in order to seek economic benefits.Whether the village committee can be established as a unit offence is highly controversial,and the results of the judgments in different places are not unified.There are mainly three different judgment ideas:affirmative,negative and compromise.The judicial determination of unit crimes committed by village committee cannot completely deny the establishment of unit crimes by village committee,but should also be regarded as a substantive judgment,using a cross perspective to organically combine the general provisions,sub-legal provisions and the interpretation of criminal law to make a comprehensive determination.

关 键 词：村委会 单位犯罪 实证研究 司法认定 

分 类 号：D924.3[政治法律—刑法学]