检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李霞 Li Xia
机构地区:[1]武汉大学国际法研究所
出 处:《宏观经济研究》2023年第11期96-106,共11页Macroeconomics
摘 要:国际法视域下的农业补贴规则的演进经历了GATT 1947及其修正、“东京回合”《补贴守则》和“乌拉圭回合”《农业协定》,从其历史沿革可以发现农业补贴改革的难点在于发达国家中心主义和各方的价值取向不同。现有文献很少前瞻性探讨在新一轮的WTO改革中农业补贴的去向和中国在深入参与WTO农业补贴改革后如何重构中国的农业补贴政策以适应WTO的要求,本文从价值取向入手,分析各国不同的价值取向,进而推导出欧美的经验并非我们可以照搬照抄的,应走出一条中国式的改革道路。The reform of agricultural subsidy rules in the context of international law has experienced GATT 1947 and its amendments,the‘Tokyo Round'Code of Subsidies and the‘Uruguay Round'Agreement on Agriculture.From its historical evolution,it can be found that the difficulties of WTO agricultural subsidy reform mainly lie in the centralism of developed countries and the different value orientation of parties.There is little forward-looking exploration in existing literature on the direction of agricultural subsidies in the new round of WTO reform and how China can restructure its agricultural subsidy policy to meet the requirements of WTO after deeply participating in WTO agricultural subsidy reform.This article starts with value orientation,analyzes different value orientations of countries,and then deduces that the experience of Europe and America cannot be copied,and should embark on a Chinese style reform path.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33