中道西用:中国管理学自主知识体系构建方向  

Chinese Dao and Western Pragmatism:Analysis on the Research Directions in Need of Constructing Independent Knowledge System for Chinese Management Theories

作　　者：余菁[1] YU Jing(Institute of Industrial Economics of CASS,Beijing,100006,China)

机构地区：[1]中国社会科学院工业经济研究所,北京100006

出　　处：《经济管理》2023年第10期5-26,共22页Business and Management Journal ( BMJ )

基　　金：中国社会科学院“登峰战略”企业管理优势学科建设项目(2022);中国社会科学院创新项目“新时代中国企业国际化研究”(2023)。

摘　　要：长期以来,中国管理学学术界沿着中西会通或东西交融的方向来发展中国管理理论。过去十余年,又涌现了发展中国情境下的管理理论与本土化中国管理理论的强烈自觉。然而,中国管理理论知识体系为西方理论及其话语体系所主导的被动局面一直未得到有效改观。本文认为,突破中国管理理论创新难的困局,需要转向以“中道”为主且兼具“西用”特质的发展方向。文中的“中道西用”,意指中国企业管理理论知识的发展应该紧密结合中国式现代化的伟大历史进程,全面深入中国企业管理实践活动中去发现和探究高理论价值的现象。未来,中国管理学研究者应加强对中国管理学自主性的认同,通过重置研究标尺和聚焦弱相互作用来深入充斥隐性知识的中国企业管理实践场景,大力探索和发展能够有效应对当下人类与科技智能共生的不确定性的新管理理论知识。只有聚焦中国企业管理实践中与文化价值观、与人紧密相关的丰裕隐性知识,才有可能驾驭和超越西方管理理论中主要与有形的物化因素、与工具理性相关的显性知识,持续生成符合中国国情和有重要时代意义的管理理论知识,进而指引中国企业在更大范围和更高层次上加快推进中国式管理现代化的实践。Over the past few decades,the Chinese management academic community has been developing Chinese management theory along the direction of the integration of East and West thoughts.There has been a strong sense of identification to the development of management theory in the Chinese context and the tendency of the localization of Chinese management theories.However,till now,the passive situation that the knowledge system of Chinese management theory is dominated by Western theories and Western discourse systems has not been fundamentally changed.This article indicates that the success of Chinese enterprise management practice not only benefits from the guidance of explicit knowledge of western modern management theory,but also is largely supported by a large amount of implicit knowledge relating to Chinese cultural values.The insightful insights corresponding to these implicit knowledge,are compared to the iceberg below the sea level.Here,the concepts of“explicit knowledge”and“implicit knowledge”proposed by Michael Polanyi are combined with Robert K.Merton's concepts of“manifest functions”and“latent functions”,to construct a theoretical analysis framework to delineate new research areas with highly theoretical value.In this framework,Polanyi Quadrant represent the research work which focus on those implicit knowledge used to achieve manifest functions;while Merton Quadrant is defined to delineate the commonsensical promising research areas,relating to implicit knowledge used to achieve latent functions.The author believes that Chinese management researchers should pay more attention to the Polanyi Quadrant,which may become a fertile ground for theoretical innovation.The article reviews the development process of modern management theories in the west over the past century,and divides the process into two stages.In the first stage before the 1970s and 1980s,early modern management theories sprouted,developed,and flourished from the vibrant western enterprise management practices.In the second stage s

关 键 词：管理理论 中国式现代化 中道 西用 

分 类 号：C930[经济管理—管理学] F270