管理科学思想史中科学与人文的撞击及嵌合——从如何看待斯金纳与马斯洛的激励理论谈起  

The Collision and Chimeric Relationship of Science and Humanities in the History of Management Science Thought:Starting from How to View Skinner and Maslow’s Motivation Theories

作　　者：张轶妹 曹蓉[1] 刘文瑞[1] ZHANG Yimei;CAO Rong;LIU Wenrui(School of Public Management,Northwest University,Xi’an,Shaanxi,710127)

机构地区：[1]西北大学公共管理学院,陕西西安710127

出　　处：《自然辩证法通讯》2023年第12期71-79,共9页Journal of Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“中国古代管理思想史论”(项目编号:19FGLB030)。

摘　　要：管理科学思想的发展是一个始终伴随科学与人文撞击并不断走向科学与人文并重的过程。管理学界普遍认为,强化理论理性至上忽略人文关怀,需要层次理论重视情感缺乏科学分析,并试图从人文角度矫正强化理论,从科学角度测量需要层次理论。这种矫枉过正的学术争鸣试图融合二者实则存在“悖论”,本质上源于对科学与人文关系的理解偏误。科学与人文是嵌合关系,正是在二者的张力作用下相互牵制、相互矫正,共同推动了管理科学思想的螺旋式发展。把握科学与人文的“双螺旋结构”,有利于矫正管理科学思想研究的偏失,为管理科学思想的创新提供助力。The development of management science thought is a process that has always been accompanied by the collision of science and humanities and moves towards equal emphasis on science and humanities.Management scholars generally recognize that reinforcement theory is supremely rational but it ignores humanistic care,hierarchy of needs theory is emotionally advanced but it lacks scientific analysis,trying to correct the reinforcement theory from a humanistic perspective and to measure the hierarchy of needs theory from a scientific perspective.There is a“paradox”in this kind of overcorrected academic debate trying to merge science and humanities.Science and humanities are in a chimerical relationship,and it is precisely under the tension of mutual restraint and correct that they jointly promote the spiral development of management science thought.Grasping the“double helix structure”of science and humanities is conducive to correcting the bias in the research of management science thinking and may provide a boost to the innovation of management science thought.

关 键 词：管理科学思想史 激励理论 科学 人文 双螺旋结构 

分 类 号：C93[经济管理—管理学]