检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘国祥 LIU Guoxiang(Guangzhou Urban Construction Planning&Design Co.,Ltd.,Guangzhou 510250,China)
机构地区:[1]广州市城建规划设计院有限公司,广东广州510250
出 处:《供水技术》2023年第6期22-25,共4页Water Technology
摘 要:以南方某水库原水为处理对象,通过跟踪监测加压溶气气浮工艺和斜管沉淀工艺出水效果,对比分析两种工艺处理低浊、高藻水库原水的处理效能。结果表明,在加药量相同的条件下,压力溶气气浮工艺对藻类、浊度、Mn、CODMn、氨氮等指标的平均去除率分别为92.96%、75.50%、75.81%、57.99%、76.29%,而斜管沉淀工艺的去除率分别为83.77%、56.28%、53.34%、36.02%、54.29%,压力溶气气浮工艺对低浊、高藻水库原水的处理效能明显高于斜管沉淀工艺。This article focused on the raw water from a specific southern reservoir,comparing and analyzing the water treatment efficiency of the pressurized dissolved air flotation process and the inclined tube sedimentation process.The evaluation was based on tracking and monitoring the effluent efficiency of both processes in treating raw water with low turbidity and high algae reservoir content.Results indicated that under the same dosage conditions,the pressurized DAF process exhibits higher average removal rates for indicators such as algae,turbidity,Mn,CODMn,ammonia nitrogen and other indicators by the pressure dissolved air flotation process were 92.96%,75.50%,75.81%,57.99%,and 76.29%,respectively.The removal rates of the inclined tube sedimentation process were 83.77%,56.28%,53.34%,36.02%,and 54.29%,respectively.The treatment efficiency of the pressure dissolved air flotation process for low turbidity and high algae reservoir raw water was significantly superior to that of the inclined tube sedimentation process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28