从对峙到共存:执行程序中居住权的保护范围及措施  

From confrontation to coexistence:protection scope and measures of the right of residence in execution procedure

作　　者：骆小春[1] 王维茗 LUO Xiao-chun;WANG Wei-ming

机构地区：[1]南京工业大学法政学院,江苏南京211106

出　　处：《东南大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2023年第6期42-55,I0001,I0002,共16页Journal of Southeast University(Philosophy and Social Science)

摘　　要：涉居执行难题涉及《民法典》新设物权与民事强制执行立法的规则协调。经我国本土化改造后的居住权,既侧重传统人役权的生存保障属性,又兼具用益性物权的财产属性。二者背后呈现的价值倾向的差异,有必要在涉居执行中通过细分居住权类型来达到分而治之的目的。剖析民事强制执行的基本价值,宜将执行程序中居住权的保护范围限定在“社会性居住权”的概念之内。对于民法典与民事强制执行立法的衔接,分别从民事私法与程序公法两个维度出发,在实体上构建有限保护的居住权审查规范,在程序上完善案外居住权人的救济措施,实现涉居执行中居住权与其他权利的平衡保护。The difficulty in residential execution lies in the contradiction between the newly established property right in the Civil Code and the rules of civil enforcement legislation.In China,the localized right of residence means the survival guarantee attribute of the traditional servitude right and the property attribute of the usufruct right,with emphasis on the former.The different values of the two attributes necessitates a subdivision of the right of residence in the implementation.Given the value of civil enforcement,we should limit the scope of this right to the“social right of residence”.Considering the transition from civil enforcement legislation to civil code,from the perspectives of civil private law and procedural public law,we should build a review standard of limited protection of residence right in entity and improve the relief measures of residents outside the case in procedure.Hopefully,a balanced protection of residence right and other rights in residential execution will be achieved.

关 键 词：涉居执行 权利对峙 社会性居住权 利益衡平 执行救济 

分 类 号：D923.2[政治法律—民商法学]