代孕合法性之法伦理批判  

Limited Liberalization or Total Ban:A Legal-Ethical Critique of the Legality of Surrogacy

作　　者：王荔[1] 岳钰涵 WANG Li;YUE Yuhan(School of National Security,Shaanxi Normal University,Xi'an 710119,Shaanxi,China)

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学国家安全学院,陕西西安710119

出　　处：《安康学院学报》2023年第6期110-116,共7页Journal of Ankang University

基　　金：中国博士后科学基金面上资助项目“法伦理学视域下‘接近正义’的司法环境治理研究”(2014M552411)。

摘　　要：代孕是否应合法化在我国当前人工生殖领域饱受争议,争议焦点在于中立自由主义和法律家长主义两种立场的选择。基于中立自由主义立场支持代孕合法化的权利说、正义说和需求说等理论具有难以自圆其说的缺陷,而基于法律家长主义之立场的“全面禁止代孕观”则是以“自主的”自由破除“向下的”自由、以“法律家长主义”维护“公共善”且以“公序良俗”回应“社会需求”,更适宜于我国当下的法伦理立场。Whether surrogacy should be legalized is controversial in the current field of artificial reproduction in China,and the controversy centers on the choice between two positions:neutral liberalism and legal paternalism.However,the theoretical foundations of the rights theory,the justice theory,and the needs theory that support the legalization of surrogacy based on the neutral liberal position have defects that are difficult to justify.This paper argues in more detail the legal and ethical basis for the prohibition of surrogacy from the standpoint of legal paternalism in terms of limiting the freedom of individuals downward,curbing the tendency of personification and commodification,and maintaining public order and morality.China should adhere to the basic position of a comprehensive ban on surrogacy,give play to the social role of law,and realize the substantive and social values of law.

关 键 词：代孕 法律家长主义 公序良俗 

分 类 号：D90-053[政治法律—法学理论]