郁嶷《中国法制史》与中国法律史教科书的书写  

The History of Chinese Legal System and the Compilation of Chinese Legal History Textbooks

作　　者：乔惠全 QIAO Huiquan(School of Law and Politics,Guangdong Ocean University,Zhanjiang 524088,Guangdong,China)

机构地区：[1]广东海洋大学法政学院,广东湛江524088

出　　处：《岭南师范学院学报》2023年第3期65-71,共7页Journal of Lingnan Normal University

基　　金：广东海洋大学2020年校级教学改革项目(580320124)。

摘　　要：郁嶷《中国法制史》采用广义法制观,将法制视为历代典章制度,而其缺失清代法制,是由它的时代性和历史局限性造成的。郁嶷《中国法制史》是一部未完成的法制史教科书,所以法史学界对其评议不一。郁嶷的《中国法制史》是“以古说古”,而当下的中国法制史和中国法律史则是“以今释古”。所以当下的《中国法律史》应该解决法治与法律之别和法律史教科书法学化的难题,而从《中国法制史》到《中国法律史》的迭代升级,也考验着法律史学界对传统法律资源进行创造性转化和创新性发展的能力。The History of Chinese Legal System written by Yu Yi adopts the broad legal view of China and regards the legal system as the institution of the past dynasties,but its lack of Qing Dynasty’s legal system is due to its times and historical limitations.As an unfinished textbook in legal history,it has ignited numerous discussion.Yu Yi adopts the method of explaining the Chinese legal systems with ancient terms while textbooks in legal history nowadays use the method of introducing them with modern terms.The compilation of The History of Chinese Law should place its emphasis on solving the difference between nomocracy and law,as well as the legalization of legal history textbooks.The transition and upgrading from The History of Chinese Legal System to The History of Chinese Law tests the academic world’s capability to creatively transform and develop the traditional legal resources.

关 键 词：郁嶷 《中国法制史》 《中国法律史》 教科书 创造性转化 

分 类 号：D909.9[政治法律—法学理论]