检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘翼峰 赵凯[1] LIU Yi-feng;ZHAO Kai(School of Humanities and Law,Northeastern University,Shenyang,Liaoning 110169,China)
出 处:《河北开放大学学报》2023年第6期57-60,共4页Journal of Hebei Open University
基 金:沈阳市法学会沈阳市社科联2023年度一般课题“完善沈阳市市场主体的信用监管机制研究”(SYFX 2023020)。
摘 要:在数字政府建设的历程中,自动化执法主要经历了四个阶段:静态阶段、互动阶段、成熟阶段和裁量阶段,就目前而言,自动化执法属于具体行政行为的范畴。自动化执法包含技术和法治两个要素,但技术不会因为法律文本的限制而停滞不前,技术的进步带来了行政执法形态和方式的变革,却也带来了程序的僭越、实体的失衡、权利救济不足等问题。因此,需要在行政法的框架下对自动化执法进行调适,严格贯彻正当程序原则,在实体上力求平衡,完善权利救济规范。In the course of digital government construction,automated law enforcement has mainly experienced four stages:static stage,interactive stage,mature stage and discretionary stage.At present,automated law enforcement belongs to the category of specific administrative acts.Automated law enforcement includes two elements:technology and rule of law,but technology will not stop because of the limitation of legal texts.The progress of technology has also brought about changes in the forms and methods of administrative law enforcement,but it has also brought about problems such as the arrogation of procedures,the imbalance of entities,and the insufficiency of rights relief.Therefore,it is necessary to adjust the automatic law enforcement under the framework of administrative law,strictly implement the principle of due process,strive for balance in the entity,and improve the standard of rights relief.
关 键 词:数字法治政府 自动化执法 正当程序 自动化行政 行政相对人权利救济
分 类 号:D922.1[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117