检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:闫朱伟 YAN Zhuwei
机构地区:[1]河南工业大学法学院
出 处:《武大国际法评论》2023年第5期117-136,共20页Wuhan University International Law Review
摘 要:国际司法实践中发展出一系列判断岛屿效力的原则,这些原则不仅包括公平原则和陆地统领海洋原则这样的基本原则,也包括条约必须遵守原则、相同事物相同对待原则、不得重塑地理原则、比例原则、不侵占原则这样的具体原则。这些具体原则是基本原则的具体化,为岛屿效力的判断提供了一定的参照。然而,这些原则并不能涵盖判断岛屿效力的全部因素,在具体案件中需要考虑哪个或哪几个原则是不确定的,加上这些原则本身具有很大的主观性,因此,岛屿效力的判断仍具不确定性。A series of principles have been developed in judicial practice to determine the effect of islands,including some basic principles such as equitable principles and the principle of the domination of the land over the sea,as well as some specific principles such as pacta sunt servanda,the principle that equal situations have to be treated equally,the principle of non-refashioning geography,proportionality and the principle of non-encroachment.These specific principles which are the crystallization of the basic principles,provide certain reference for the judgment of islands'effect.However,these principles cannot cover all the factors that determine the effect of islands.It is uncertain which one or several principles need to be considered in a specific case.And these principles themselves entail great subjectivity.Therefore,the determination of the islands'effect is still filled with great uncertainty.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.70