论破产清算中保留所有权出卖人的权利实现  

Rights of Sellers in Title Retention in Bankrupt Liquidating

作　　者：全立 QUAN Li(Shool of Law,Nanjing University,Nanjing Jiangsu,210093,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《西南石油大学学报（社会科学版）》2023年第6期68-77,共10页Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：所有权保留买卖的性质素有争论。《民法典》围绕担保属性对所有权保留买卖进行规则设计,使保留的所有权在本质上发挥了担保物权的作用。在配套的司法解释和学者释义的作用下,此做法引起的体系悖反和文义冲突虽在民法领域得到缓和,但在破产程序中,面对出卖人享有的权利究竟是完全的所有权还是就标的物求偿的担保物权的问题,法院立场飘摇不定。因此,在适用破产法时,应重申所有权保留的担保属性;出卖人的权利实现应以就物求偿为导向,在主债权受偿、损害赔偿以及代偿取回权问题上遵循担保物权的内在逻辑。当然,为了不产生文义冲突,法律解释应认为出卖人享有的是一种负余额清算义务的所有权。The Civil Code has designed the rules for the sale of retention of title around the attribute of security,so that the retained ownership essentially plays the role of security interest.Judicial interpretation and scholars’interpretation have alleviated the systematic contradiction and semantic conflict in civil law,but it has incurred adverse effect in the bankruptcy procedure.When determining whether the right of the seller is a complete ownership or a security right which claims on property,the stands of courts are ambiguous.Therefore,when applying the relevant rules of the bankruptcy law,the security attribute of ownership retention should be emphasized.The realization of the seller’s rights should follow the idea of claiming on property,and should follow the internal logic of the security interest in the claim of the creditor’s main right,the damage and the right of recall by subrogation.To avoid conflict in meaning,law interpretation should hold that the seller has a kind of ownership with legal liquidation obligation.

关 键 词：所有权保留 破产 取回 担保物权 代偿取回 

分 类 号：DF521[政治法律—民商法学]