“割”“剖”形讹与古籍校读  

Proofreading Ancient Book Sentences Based on the Errors of Ge(割)and Pou(剖)With Similar Shape

作　　者：喻威 YU Wei(Research and Conservation Center for Unearthed Texts,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084)

机构地区：[1]清华大学出土文献研究与保护中心,北京100084

出　　处：《绵阳师范学院学报》2023年第12期63-73,81,共12页Journal of Mianyang Teachers＇ College

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“出土涉医文献与古医书经典化研究”(19BZS012)。

摘　　要：“割”“剖”来源不同,但在俗书中形近易讹,典籍中常见讹误之例。据此形讹现象及相关语言文字材料,可校订古书中的误字。《为君难》“割毫折芒”、《新论·求辅》“割心相信”、《汉书·高惠高后文功臣表》“割符”、《与阮嗣宗书》“割石索宝”、《抱朴子·释滞》“割乎文石之中”、《抱朴子·道意》“千割百判”中的“割”当为“剖”。在校读过程中,还对“副辜”“剖符”“拌蚌”“割玉刀”等语词作了解读,提出校读古籍时要关注俗字中的形近讹误现象。The sources of Ge(割)and Pou(剖)are different,but in popular form of characters,the form is similar,and examples of errors are common in classical books.Based on the phenomenon of errors and related language materials,it is possible to correct errors in ancient books.Ge(割)in ancient books such as Weijun Nan(《为君难》),Qiufu of Xinshu(《新论·求辅》),Gaohui Gaohou Wen Gongchen Biao of Hanshu(《汉书·高惠高后文功臣表》),Letter with Ruan Sizong(《与阮嗣宗书》),Shizhi and Daoyi of Baopuzi(《抱朴子·释滞》《抱朴子·道意》)should be revised to Pou(剖).During the research process,we also interpreted words such as Fugu(副辜),Pou fu(剖符),Panbang(拌蚌),and Geyudao(割玉刀),and proposed that when proofreading ancient books,attention should be paid to the phenomenon of similar shape in popular form of characters.

关 键 词：割 剖 形讹 俗字 古籍校勘 

分 类 号：H12[语言文字—汉语]