检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李浩[1] 王庆宇[1] Li Hao;Wang Qingyu
出 处:《学海》2023年第6期161-169,共9页Academia Bimestris
摘 要:民事在线作证展现出降低作证成本、强化对证人的保护、保障作证活动顺利进行、缓解证人的人际关系顾虑以及实现司法公正的比较优势,具有广泛的适用前景。但当前民事在线作证仍然面临着性质不明确、适用决定机制不健全、法院对在线作证过程的掌控容易被削弱等问题。为优化民事诉讼在线作证机制、充分发挥其优势,应当明确将其作为一种出庭作证方式,积极探索该作证方式在线下审理的民事案件中的适用,确立由法院决定在线作证适用的机制,现阶段应当以证人至当地法院的视频室作证为原则。Testifying online in civil litigation shows comparative advantages in reducing the cost,strengthening the protection of witnesses,ensuring the smooth progress of testifying,alleviating witnesses'worries about interpersonal relationships,and being conducive to achieving justice.Cur-rently,it still faces some dilemmas,such as unclear status,incomplete application decision-making mechanism,and the court's control over testifying online is easily weakened.In order to optimize the mechanism of testifying online in civil litigation and fully leverage its advantages,it should be clearly defined as a way of testifying in court,its application in civil cases heard on the scene should be ex-plored actively,and a dicision-making mechanism for the court to decide whether to apply should be established.What's more,witnesses should testify in the video rooms of local courts in principle at this stage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.19