建立工程造价鉴定争议解决机制的必要性  

The Necessity of Establishing a Dispute Resolution Mechanism for Engineering Cost Appraisal

作　　者：司海 Si Hai(Tianyuanquan(Beijing)International Engineering Project Management Co.Ltd.,Beijing 100048,China)

机构地区：[1]天圆全(北京)国际工程项目管理有限公司,北京100048

出　　处：《工程造价管理》2023年第6期81-85,共5页Engineering Cost Management

摘　　要：工程造价司法鉴定出具的鉴定意见是工程建设施工合同造价纠纷审判的重要依据,鉴定机构与鉴定人的专业水平公正性对于双方当事人及案件能够公平地判定至关重要。而在工程造价鉴定中,因鉴定人的专业能力引起的错误与争议、以鉴代裁等问题经常出现。法院审判人员由于对建筑造价知识的认知不足,在审理案件中通常会采纳鉴定意见,而鉴定报告中存在的错误鉴定意见会侵犯某一方当事人的合法权益。目前的鉴定制度对鉴定人出具的鉴定意见缺乏争议解决及监督,亟待建立完善的争议解决及监督机制。文章从发现的错误鉴定意见出发,探讨建立造价鉴定的争议解决机制的必要性,促进工程造价鉴定更加公正、合法、客观。The appraisal opinion issued by the judicial appraisal of construction cost is an important basis for the trial of construction contract cost disputes,the professional competence and impartiality of the appraiser and the appraiser are very important to the fair and successful judgment of both parties and cases.But in the current project cost appraisal,because the appraiser's professional ability causes the mistake,the dispute,by the appraisal appraisal and so on questions and so on are everywhere,because of the court judicial personnel to the construction cost knowledge insufficiency,expert opinions are usually adopted in trial cases,and the wrong expert opinions in expert reports may violate the legitimate rights and interests of a party.The current appraisal system lacks dispute resolution and supervision to the appraisal opinions issued by appraisers,so it is urgent to establish a perfect dispute resolution and supervision mechanism.This paper discusses the necessity of establishing the dispute settlement mechanism of cost appraisal from the view of error appraisal,promote the project cost appraisal more just,legal,objective.

关 键 词：争议解决 监督机制 工程造价鉴定 

分 类 号：TU723.3[建筑科学—建筑技术科学]