IPTV司法救济中的分歧及其化解之道  

The Differences in IPTV Judicial Relief and Its Solution

作　　者：孙山 SUN Shan(Civil and Commercial Law School,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)

机构地区：[1]西南政法大学民商法学院,重庆401120

出　　处：《时代法学》2023年第6期35-44,共10页Presentday Law Science

基　　金：重庆市教育委员会人文社会科学类研究基地项目“短视频产业侵权治理的著作权法回应”(22SKJD023)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：IPTV司法救济中法院对被控侵权行为涉及的权利类型和责任的承担,存在一定分歧。分歧的成因,既有技术发展的无限可能与人类有限理性之间的矛盾,也有请求权和民事责任范畴在我国民事立法中纠缠不清所导致的冲突。在立法论层面,上述分歧的化解可通过按照行为类型完成权利配置的方式实现。在司法论层面,需要依据立法目的明确相关立法的真实含义,基于请求权内核正确理解归责原则,细化停止侵害请求权的行使及其限制的条件。In IPTV judicial relief,there are some differences on the types of rights and responsibilities involved in the accused tort.The cause of divergence is not only the contradiction between the infinite possibility of technological development and the limited rationality of human beings,but also the conflict caused by the tangled right toclaim and the category of civil liability in our civil legislation.At the legislative level,the above differences can be resolved by completing the allocation of rights according to the type of behavior.At the judicial level,it is necessary to clarify the true meaning of relevant legislation according to the legislative purpose,correctly understand the principle of liability based on the core of the right to claim,and refine the conditions for the exercise of claim on cessation of infringement and its restriction.

关 键 词：IPTV 广播权 信息网络传播权 权利类型兜底条款 归责原则 停止侵害请求权 

分 类 号：D923.1[政治法律—民商法学]