隐名股东案外人异议之诉的裁判思维  

Judgments upon Lawsuit Filed by Dormant Shareholder against the Executive Objection

作　　者：杨秀清[1] Yang Xiuqing

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学

出　　处：《中国应用法学》2023年第6期96-105,共10页China Journal of Applied Jurisprudence

摘　　要：基于金钱债权执行依据,执行登记于执行债务人名下的股权时,隐名股东往往因股权代持而提起案外人异议之诉,裁判此类案件基于对涉及隐名股东与执行债权人之间相互冲突利益之衡量,融入具有主观性的商事外观主义、信赖利益等价值判断;为统一法律适用,有必要回归法教义学框架下案外人异议之诉的应有制度逻辑基础,即登记在执行债务人名下的股权是否系可供执行的责任财产,并在民事诉讼法规范下形成裁判思维。因此,应明确法院裁判的基础是股权代持关系中的财产权归属,而非股权归属;在隐名股东因遭到执行债务人反对而对其提起确权诉讼时,应适用诉的合并制度解决隐名股东提起的案外人异议之诉和确权诉讼。When the court executes the equity registered in the execution debtor's name on the basis of monetary debt,it has become a common practice for dormant shareholders to file lawsuits against executive objection due to proxy ownership of the equity.Thus,the courts often rely on measuring the conflicting interests between dormant shareholders and executing creditors when they adjudicate such cases,incorporating subjective value judgments such as commercial externalism and reliance interests,which leads to different judgment results.In order to achieve judicial unity,it is necessary to return to the institutional logical basis of the system of executive objection lawsuit filed by outsiders under the framework of legal dogmatics,to judge whether the equity registered in the name of the executing debtor is an enforceable liability property,and to form a judgment thoughts under the norms of civil procedure law.Therefore,it should be clarified that the basis of court decisions is the ownership of property rights in the relationship of equity proxy holding,rather than the ownership of equity itself.When a dormant shareholder files a lawsuit to confirm his rights due to objection from the executing debtor,the court should merge the lawsuit filed by the dormant shareholder against executing debtor and the declaratory action.

关 键 词：案外人异议之诉 制度逻辑 价值判断 隐名股东 财产权归属 

分 类 号：D922.291.91[政治法律—经济法学] D923[政治法律—法学]