融贯性作为真之定义的逻辑分析  

A Logical Analysis of Coherence as the Definition of Truth

作　　者：贾承国 JIA Cheng-guo(School of Philosopht,Sichuan Normal University,Chengdu,Sichuan 610066,China)

机构地区：[1]四川师范大学哲学学院,四川成都610066

出　　处：《贵州工程应用技术学院学报》2023年第5期77-83,共7页Journal of Guizhou University Of Engineering Science

基　　金：国家社科基金后期资助项目“数学哲学视域下的公理化真理论研究”,项目编号:21FZXB037。

摘　　要：融贯性作为真之定义在上个世纪被提出来之后,融贯论与符合论、紧缩论一起,被认为是真理论最有影响力的三种理论。然而自从融贯论被提出来之后,一直受到许多批评,其中以罗素的一句批评最为出名,即“融贯论无法将真命题与之协调的童话区分开来”,也就是说,融贯论面临的一个问题是很难找到一个合适的概念系统,依之可以给定任意命题的真值条件。融贯论者认为这种批评假定了某种真理论立场,犯了非形式谬误中的乞题谬误。参考目前通行的关于融贯性的定义,通过现代逻辑的角度先分析如果概念系统存在,概念系统应该是什么样的命题集。在假设融贯论概念系统存在的基础之上,运用现代逻辑的技术方法,得出一个结论,如果不改变我们现有的概念框架系统,为融贯论在逻辑学的框架内找出一个合适的定义是不可能的。After coherence as the definition of truth was put forward in the last century,together with correspondence theory and deflation theory,it is considered to be one of the most influential theories of truth theory.However,since the coherence theory was put forward,it has been criticized a lot,among which Russell’s most famous criticism is that“the coherence theory cannot distinguish the true proposition from the fairy tale that is coordinated with it”,that is to say,the coherence theory faces One problem with is that it is difficult to find a suitable conceptual system,according to which the truth conditions of arbitrary propositions can be given.Coherence theory faces many criticisms,and the response of coherence theorists to this criticism is that this kind of criticism first assumes a certain truth theory position,which is the title-begging fallacy among the informal fallacies.From the perspective of modern logic,analysing what a conceptional system should be,the author draws a conclusion that it is impossible to find a suitable conceptual framwork of logic for Coherence Theory assuming the conceptional system on the basis of the current definition of coherence.

关 键 词：融贯论 真理论 信念集合 融贯性 

分 类 号：B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]