超越普遍主义和相对主义人权观——对《维也纳宣言和行动纲领》的再阐发  

Beyond Universalist and Relativist Views of Human Rights——A Reinterpretation of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action

作　　者：张万洪[1,2] 诸昌盛 Zhang Wanhong;Zhu Changsheng

机构地区：[1]武汉大学法学院 [2]武汉大学人权研究院

出　　处：《人权研究》2023年第4期23-40,共18页Chinese Journal of Human Rights

摘　　要：《维也纳宣言和行动纲领》在普遍主义和相对主义人权观之间的态度颇为暧昧,这为国际人权的对话与合作创造了条件,却也使得实质性成果无法取得。两种人权观有着各自的理论层次,在实践中有着各自的不同走向,这有其深层原因。破解普遍主义和相对主义人权观争论的症结之后两者之间存在着沟通的可能。中国人权话语有从普遍主义和相对主义争论中突围的必要。充分利用历史传统和本土资源、积极参与联合国人权机制,是突围的可行方案。The ambiguous attitude of the Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action(VDPA)between universalism and relativism in human rights has created conditions for international human rights dialogue and cooperation,but has also prevented the achievement of substantive results.There are deep-rooted reasons why the two views on human rights have their own theoretical levels and different directions in practice.Having broken down the crux of the debate between universalist and relativist views of human rights,there is a possibility of communication between the two.For human rights discourse in China,there is a need to break out of the debate between universalism and relativism.Making full use of historical traditions and local resources,and actively participating in the United Nations’human rights mechanisms are feasible solutions.

关 键 词：《维也纳宣言和行动纲领》 普遍主义 文化相对主义 人权话语 

分 类 号：D998.2[政治法律—国际法学]