煤矿老空工作面和相邻工作面物探资料对比分析研究  

Comparative analysis and research on geophysical exploration data of old goaf area working face and adjacent working face in coal mine

作　　者：郭绍华 张东 Guo Shaohua;Zhang Dong(China Coal Third Construction(Group)Co.,Ltd.,Suzhou 234000,China;Hebei Coal Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Xingtai 054000,China;Key Laboratory of Mine Water Disaster Detection and Prevention and Control,Xingtai 054000,China;Hebei Engineering Research Center of Mine Geophysical Exploration,Xingtai 054000,China)

机构地区：[1]中煤第三建设(集团)有限责任公司,安徽宿州234000 [2]河北煤炭科学研究院有限公司,河北邢台054000 [3]矿井水害探测与防控国家矿山安全监察局重点实验室,河北邢台054000 [4]矿井物探河北省工程研究中心,河北邢台054000

出　　处：《煤炭与化工》2023年第11期80-85,共6页Coal and Chemical Industry

摘　　要：矿方已知详细资料的老空区,危害程度和不可探查度一般较小,但不可避免的会对其邻近未开采工作面的地质和水文地质条件产生影响。综合物探方法是指采用包括瞬变电磁、幅频电透视、电法测深、无线电波坑道透视等技术相结合的施工及解释方法。本文通过对比分析西庞矿9302工作面和9118工作面回采前物探成果对比,确定其对物探施工和矿井安全生产具有的现实意义。The hazard degree and undetectable degree of the old goaf area with detailed information known by the mine were generally small,but it would inevitably affect the geological and hydrogeological conditions of the adjacent unmined working face.The comprehensive geophysical exploration method referred to the construction and interpretation method combining transient electromagnetic,amplitude frequency electrical perspective,electric depth-measurement,radio wave tunnel perspective and other technologies.In this paper,by comparing and analyzing the geophysical exploration results of No.9302 Face and No.9118 Face in Xipang Mine before mining,it was determined that it had practical significance for geophysical exploration construction and mine safety production.

关 键 词：老空区 综合物探 解释方法 

分 类 号：TD74[矿业工程—矿井通风与安全]