检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:黄锫[1] Huang Pei
机构地区:[1]同济大学法学院
出 处:《比较法研究》2023年第6期184-198,共15页Journal of Comparative Law
摘 要:数字平台算法侵害包括信息操控类、标签设定类、数据收集类和技术缺陷类四种理想类型。数字平台算法侵害行政法律责任设置的法理基础是数字平台的公共性导致算法侵害行为会对公共利益造成影响,而行政法律责任的设置较之民事法律责任更能有效地维护公共利益。为了应对人工智能算法的普遍应用,数字平台算法侵害行政法律责任的责任主体应设定为平台企业。数字平台算法侵害行政法律责任的责任方式主要包括“接受行政处罚”和“改正违法行为”两种类型,这两种行政法律责任方式都应采用无过错责任的归责原则。Digital Platform Algorithm Infringement(DPAI)includes four distinct types:information manipulation,label setting,data collection,and technical defects.The legal basis for the establishment of administrative legal responsibility for DPAI stems from the public nature of these platforms,as algorith-mic misconduct can significantly impact the public interest.In comparison to civil legal responsibility,administrative legal responsibility is better suited to effectively safeguarding the public interest.In order to cope with the widespread application of artificial intelligence algorithms,the platform enterprise should be designated as the responsible entity for administrative legal responsibility regarding DPAI.The prima-ry modes of DPAI’s administrative legal responsibility for DPAI include"acceptance of administrative penalties"and"remedying unlawful conduct."Both of these two administrative legal responsibility ap-proaches should adhere to the principle of strict liability without fault.
关 键 词:数字平台 算法侵害 行政法律责任 责任主体 归责原则
分 类 号:D922.16[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学] D922.1[政治法律—法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.26