毒品犯罪案件证据审查模式研究  

Research on the Evidence Review Mode of Drug Crime Cases

作　　者：赵靖[1] 毛海霖 Zhao Jing;Mao Hailin(Chongqing Beibei District People's Procuratorate,Chongqing 400713)

机构地区：[1]重庆市北碚区人民检察院,重庆400713

出　　处：《警学研究》2023年第5期72-81,共10页Police Science Research

摘　　要：印证审查在毒品犯罪案件证据审查中虽然具有普遍适用价值,但难以解决部分毒品犯罪的特殊证据属性引起的证明难题。毒品的易损毁性、犯罪行为的可分离性和高度隐蔽性等特征,以及侦查取证不及时、不规范,易致毒品犯罪案件呈现“孤证”的特殊证据构造,在犯罪嫌疑人拒绝作出有罪供述的情形下,严格适用印证审查模式或导致追诉犯罪陷入两难境地。检察官的证据审查思维应从对证据合法性、客观性、关联性的“三性”审查向证据的证据能力、证明力二阶层审查转变,避免对印证审查的过度注重和机械化运用。在此基础上,以打破特殊犯罪中司法证明的僵局为契机,进一步实现由印证审查向坚持客观印证与主观“自由心证”耦合的路径改造,推动公诉环节证据审查的规则转型。Although the verification review has universal application value in the review of evidence in drug crime cases,it is difficult to solve the proof problems caused by the special evidentiary attributes of some drug crimes.The vulnerability of drugs,the separability and high concealment of criminal acts,and the untimely and irregular investigation and evidence collection can easily lead to the special evidence structure of"solitary evidence"in drug crime cases.If the criminal suspect refuses to make a guilty confession,the strict application of the verification review model may lead to difficulties in prosecuting crimes.The prosecutor's evidence review thinking should be changed from the"three-level"review of evidence legitimacy,objectivity and relevance to the two-level review of evidence ability and probative force,so as to avoid excessive emphasis and mechanized application of verification review.On this basis,in order to break the deadlock of judicial proof in special crimes,we should further realize the path transformation from verification review to the coupling of objective corroboration and subjective"free evaluation of evidence",and promote the rule transformation of evidence review in public prosecution.

关 键 词：毒品犯罪 印证审查 孤证 司法证明 二阶层审查 

分 类 号：D917.6[政治法律—法学]