检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王希琛 WANG Xichen
机构地区:[1]德惠市夏家店街道
出 处:《吉林省教育学院学报》2023年第11期181-186,共6页Journal of Jilin Provincial Institute of Education
摘 要:数字经济时代,委托处理个人信息有助于促进个人信息的合理利用与流动共享,进而实现信息的经济价值。然而,委托处理个人信息侵权责任认定在现有立法上存在诸多障碍,尤其体现在侵权责任承担形式尚存争议、受托人法律地位存疑以及责任主体识别困难等。形塑委托处理个人信息的责任认定范式,应首先坚持信息处理主体二元角色转型逻辑,其次,细化适用于不同受托人角色定位的委托处理信息归责原则,最后,构建责任主体识别的优化路径。In the era of digital economy,entrusting the processing of personal information helps individual promote the rational utilization,flow and sharing of personal information,thereby achieving the economic value of information.However,there are many obstacles to entrusting the processing of personal information in existing legislation to identify tort liability.In particular,there are still disputes over the form of liability bearing for tort,doubts about the legal status of trustees and difficulties in identifying subject to liabilities.In order to shape the responsibility identification paradigm for entrusting the processing of personal information,in the first place,the dual role transformation logic of information processing subjects should be insisted.In the second place,principles of assigning responsibility to entrusted processing information applicable to different trustee roles should be refined.In the last place,an optimized path for the identification of subject liabilities should be constructed.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7