卢埃林法律现实主义视角下疑难案件的司法进路  被引量:3

Judicial Approach to Difficult Cases from the Perspective of Llewellyn′s Legal Realism

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:张晓萍[1] 李旭冉 Zhang Xiaoping;Li Xuran(College of Humanity and Law,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150040,China)

机构地区:[1]东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040

出  处:《黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版)》2023年第10期57-62,共6页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)

基  金:2021年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“基层检察院司法责任制综合配套改革实证研究”(课题编号:GJ2021C11)。

摘  要:法律形式主义思维与方法在我国占据着核心地位,社会的疾速发展使现行法律无法贴合社会实践,疑难案件裁判面临困境。严格的形式主义裁判方式不利于社会实质正义的实现,维护社会正义与法律权威的需求督促着对疑难案件司法进路的探索。卢埃林现实主义有独特的疑难案件司法思维,强调法律的工具性,注重后果取向,对疑难案件裁判模式探索有很高价值,期望为我国疑难案件的司法裁判寻求一条现实主义与形式主义的平衡之路。Formalistic thinking and methods hold a central position in China′s legal system,yet the rapid development of society has caused a disconnect between existing laws and social practices.This has posed challenges for judges when dealing with difficult cases.The strict adherence to formalism in the judicial process hinders the realization of substantive justice in society.The need to uphold social justice and legal authority calls for exploration of judicial approaches in complex cases.Llewellyn′s realism has a unique judicial thinking in difficult cases,emphasizes the instrumental nature of the law and consequence-oriented.It has great value in exploring the adjudication mode for difficult cases and is expected to seek a balanced path between realism and formalism in the judicial adjudication of difficult cases in China.

关 键 词:疑难案件 卢埃林 法律现实主义 司法裁判 

分 类 号:D926.2[政治法律—法学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象