检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张晓萍[1] 李旭冉 Zhang Xiaoping;Li Xuran(College of Humanity and Law,Northeast Forestry University,Harbin,Heilongjiang 150040,China)
机构地区:[1]东北林业大学文法学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150040
出 处:《黑龙江工业学院学报(综合版)》2023年第10期57-62,共6页Journal of Heilongjiang University of Technology(Comprehensive Edition)
基 金:2021年度最高人民检察院检察理论研究课题“基层检察院司法责任制综合配套改革实证研究”(课题编号:GJ2021C11)。
摘 要:法律形式主义思维与方法在我国占据着核心地位,社会的疾速发展使现行法律无法贴合社会实践,疑难案件裁判面临困境。严格的形式主义裁判方式不利于社会实质正义的实现,维护社会正义与法律权威的需求督促着对疑难案件司法进路的探索。卢埃林现实主义有独特的疑难案件司法思维,强调法律的工具性,注重后果取向,对疑难案件裁判模式探索有很高价值,期望为我国疑难案件的司法裁判寻求一条现实主义与形式主义的平衡之路。Formalistic thinking and methods hold a central position in China′s legal system,yet the rapid development of society has caused a disconnect between existing laws and social practices.This has posed challenges for judges when dealing with difficult cases.The strict adherence to formalism in the judicial process hinders the realization of substantive justice in society.The need to uphold social justice and legal authority calls for exploration of judicial approaches in complex cases.Llewellyn′s realism has a unique judicial thinking in difficult cases,emphasizes the instrumental nature of the law and consequence-oriented.It has great value in exploring the adjudication mode for difficult cases and is expected to seek a balanced path between realism and formalism in the judicial adjudication of difficult cases in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.149.241.32