检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Nushin Moussavi Biuki Hamid Reza Talari Mohammad Hossein Tabatabaei Masoumeh Abedzadeh-Kalahroudi Hossein Akbari Mahsa Masjedi Esfahani Reihaneh Faghihi
机构地区:[1]Department of Surgery,Trauma Research Center,Kashan University of Medical Sciences,Kashan,Iran [2]Department of Radiology,Kashan University of Medical Sciences,Kashan,Iran [3]Trauma Research Center,Kashan University of Medical Sciences,Kashan,Iran [4]Department of Biostatistics,Trauma Research Center,Kashan University of Medical Sciences,Kashan,Iran
出 处:《Chinese Journal of Traumatology》2023年第6期357-362,共6页中华创伤杂志(英文版)
基 金:This study was supported by deputy of research,Kashan University of Medical Sciences(Grant no:99116).
摘 要:Purpose:Despite advances in modern medicine,traumatic brain injuries(TBIs)are still a major medical problem.Early diagnosis of TBI is crucial for clinical decision-making and prognosis.This study aims to compare the predictive value of Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores in predicting the 6-month outcomes in blunt TBI patients.Methods:This cohort study was conducted on blunt TBI patients of 15 years or older.All of them were admitted to the surgical emergency department of Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Kashan,Iran from 2020 to 2021 and had abnormal trauma-related findings on brain CT images.The patients’demographic data such as age,gender,history of comorbid conditions,mechanism of trauma,Glasgow coma scale,CT images,length of hospital stay,and surgical procedures were recorded.The Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores were simultaneously determined according to the existing guidelines.The included patients'6-month outcome was determined using the Glasgow outcome scale extended.M Data were analyzed by SPSS software version 16.0.Sensitivity,specificity,negative/positive predictive value and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve were calculated for each test.The Kappa agreement coefficient and Kuder Richardson-20 were used to compare the scoring systems.Results:Altogether 171 TBI patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria,with the mean age of(44.9±20.2)years.Most patients were male(80.7%),had traffic related injuries(83.1%)and mild TBIs(64.3%).Patients with lower Glasgow coma scale had higher Helsinki,Rotterdam,and Stockholm CT scores and lower Glasgow outcome scale extended scores.Among all the scoring systems,the Helsinki and Stockholm scores showed the highest agreement in predicting patients’outcomes(kappa=0.657,p<0.001).The Rotterdam scoring system had the highest sensitivity(90.1%)in predicting death of TBI patients,whereas the Helsinki scoring system had the highest sensitivity(89.8%)in predicting the 6-month outcome in TBI patients.Conclusion:The Rotterdam scoring
关 键 词:Brain injuries traumatic TRAUMATIC Rotterdam CT scoring system Helsinki CT scoring system Stockholm CT scoring system CT scan Glasgow outcome scale extended
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.139.45