《吴宁葛氏宗谱》辨伪四则——兼论家谱文献利用问题  

Falsification Identification of Fours Pieces in The Genealogy of Ge Family in Wuning

作　　者：梅华 MEI Hua(School of Liberal Arts,Jiangsu Second Normal University,Nanjing,Jiangsu 210013)

机构地区：[1]江苏第二师范学院文学院,江苏南京210013

出　　处：《绍兴文理学院学报》2023年第11期97-107,共11页Journal of Shaoxing University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金一般项目“家谱所见宋代文学文献整理与研究”(19BZW080)。

摘　　要：上海图书馆收藏有《吴宁葛氏宗谱》九部,这些宗谱保留的内容多寡不一,其中以乾隆五十六年(1791)葛子瑄等纂修的《吴宁葛氏宗谱》、道光二十六年(1846)葛仁禄等纂修的《吴宁葛氏宗谱》保存相对完整。《吴宁葛氏宗谱》中保存的葛洪磨勘转官告身、《恩赐文阁学士葛洪乞归省御诗》、葛洪《重修灵岳寺记》、黄溍《中和堂记》存在作伪嫌疑,兹予以考辨。在此基础上,对家谱文献的利用问题做一思考。家谱文献主要有谱序、传记、艺文等,这些文献内容丰富但瑕瑜互见,其中存在不少任意删改或假托名人等情况。这就要求我们在使用家谱文献时必须仔细辨别,去伪存真。Shanghai Library houses nine genealogies of GE Family in Wuning.The genealogies are different in their contents.Among them,the two versions are relatively intact of Genealogy of GE Family in Wuning respectively compiled by GE Zixiang in the 56th year of Qianlong(1791)and Ge Renlu in the 26th year of Daoguang(1846).Ge Hong’s investigation and transfer to the officialdom,Ge Hong’s poem of applying to the Emperor for returning to the province,Ge Hong’s record of rebuilding Lingyue Temple and Huang Zhen’s record of Zhonghe Hall,which are now preserved in The Genealogy of Ge Family in Wuning,are suspected of forgery and is hereby examined and identified.On this basis,the paper reconsiders the utilization of genealogical literature.Genealogy literature mainly encompasses genealogies,biographies,artistic works,etc.These literature is rich in content but with both merits and demerits.There are many cases of arbitrary deletions or pseudonyms of celebrities.We are required to carefully distinguish between the truth and falsehood for proper citation when using genealogical documents.

关 键 词：《吴宁葛氏宗谱》 辨伪 文献问题 

分 类 号：I207.62[文学—中国文学] K244[历史地理—历史学]