基于多源数据的中国非遗资源旅游利用潜力评价与分区研究  

Evaluation of intangible cultural heritage tourism utilization potential and type area division in China based on multi-source data

作　　者：鄢继尧 赵媛 郝丽莎 郭宇 YAN Jiyao;ZHAO Yuan;HAO Lisha;GUO Yu(School of Geographical Science,Nanjing Normal University/Jiangsu Center for Collaborative Innovation in Geographical Information Resource Development and Application,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学地理科学学院江苏省地理信息资源开发与利用协同创新中心,南京210023

出　　处：《地理研究》2023年第12期3294-3312,共19页Geographical Research

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(41971248)。

摘　　要：基于多源数据构建非遗资源旅游利用潜力评价指标体系,运用熵值法、K-means聚类法等方法,分析非遗资源旅游利用潜力及各维度的空间分异特征,识别具有相似优势的非遗资源与旅游融合发展类型区。研究发现:①中国非遗资源旅游利用潜力总体较低,区域差异显著。吴越、燕赵、闽台、齐鲁文化区较为理想地实现了资源、载体、支撑“三维目标”的有机统一,非遗资源旅游利用潜力较高;关东文化区潜力最低。②非遗资源旅游利用潜力的空间分布以行政级别高的城市和部分历史文化名城、少数民族聚居地为核心,以文化区交界处为边缘,呈现明显的“核心-边缘”特征。潜力高的城市仅有北京、上海;潜力较高的城市除广州、杭州、重庆等10个行政级别高的城市外还包括晋城、苏州、黄山、黔东南、晋中、泉州;潜力中等的城市主要分布在吴越、燕赵、齐鲁文化区;潜力较低及潜力低的城市数量多、范围广。分维度看,载体维度区域差异最大,其次是支撑和资源维度。③全国可分为五大非遗资源与旅游融合发展类型区。三维优势均高区仅包括北京、上海;支撑优势区包括广州、杭州等11个城市;资源-载体优势区包括晋城、黔东南等5个城市;三维优势中等区包括69个城市,主要分布在吴越、燕赵、齐鲁等文化区;三维优势均低区城市数量高达249个,广泛分布在中国全域。最后为不同类型区非遗资源与旅游融合发展提出针对性的发展策略。Based on multi-source data,this paper constructs an evaluation index system of intangible cultural heritage tourism utilization potential,uses entropy method to analyze the spatial differentiation characteristics of intangible cultural heritage tourism utilization potential,and uses K-means clustering method to classify the types of areas for the integrated development of intangible cultural heritage and tourism with similar advantages.The study found that:(1)The overall intangible cultural heritage tourism utilization potential in China is low,with significant regional differences.Wuyue,Yanzhao,Mintai and Qilu cultural zones have achieved the organic unity of the"three-dimensional goal"of resources,carriers and supports,and have a high potential for intangible cultural heritage tourism utilization.The Kanto Cultural District has the lowest potential.(2)The spatial distribution of the intangible cultural heritage tourism potential takes the cities with high administrative level,some famous historical and cultural cities and ethnic minority settlements as the core,and takes the junction of cultural areas as the edge,showing obvious"core-edge"characteristics.Cities with high potential include Beijing and Shanghai;cities with relatively high potential include high-level administrative cities such as Guangzhou,Hangzhou,Chongqing and other cities such as Jincheng,Huangshan,Qiandongnan,Jinzhong,Quanzhou;cities with medium potential are mainly distributed in Wuyue,Yanzhao and Qilu cultural areas;cities with low potential and relatively low potential are numerous and extensive.In terms of sub-dimensions,the carrier dimension has the largest regional difference,followed by the support and resource dimensions.(3)China can be divided into five types of areas for the integrated development of intangible cultural heritage and tourism.The areas with high advantages only include Beijing and Shanghai;Support advantageous areas include Guangzhou,Hangzhou and other 11 cities.The advantaged medium areas include 69 cities,mainly dis

关 键 词：非遗资源 旅游利用潜力评价 空间分异特征 类型区 融合发展 

分 类 号：G122[文化科学] F592[经济管理—旅游管理] K901[经济管理—产业经济]