垃圾信息侵权规制路径与规则优化:惩罚性赔偿的引入  

Optimising the Path and Rule of Spam Infringement Regulation:The Introduction of Punitive Damages

作　　者：廖建求 田斌 LIAO Jianqiu;TIAN Bin(College of Public Administration,China University of Geosciences,Wuhan 430074,China)

机构地区：[1]中国地质大学(武汉)公共管理学院,武汉430074

出　　处：《北京科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2024年第1期94-105,共12页Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing(Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“人工智能领域经营者滥用市场支配地位的反垄断法规制研究”(编号:20BFX148)。

摘　　要：垃圾信息侵权的大规模性、低成本性及难察觉性决定了对其治理需要运用公法与私法相结合的规制思维,其行为评价及相应的权利救济亦是刑事、行政及民事等法律工具综合运用的结果。在协同共治框架下,惩罚性赔偿是垃圾信息侵权得到良好治理的有效法律工具补充。惩罚性赔偿的扩张趋势、核心功能及滥诉可控等均为其适用垃圾信息侵权提供了制度优势。适用条件的修正、举证原则的明确、赔偿额的确定、惩罚性赔偿基金及集团诉讼制度等规则优化,为惩罚性赔偿制度适用于垃圾信息大规模侵权提供了保障。The large-scale,low-cost and hard-to-detect nature of spam infringement determines the need to use a combination of public and private law to regulate its management.The evaluation of its behaviors and the corresponding rights and remedies are also the result of the combined use of criminal,administrative and civil legal tools.Under the framework of collaborative governance,punitive damages are an effective legal tool to supplement the effective governance of spam infringement.The expansion trend,core function and controllable abuse of punitive damages provide institutional advantages for its application to spaminfringement.The amendment of the applicable conditions,the clarification of the principle of proof,the determination of the amount of compensation,the establishment of the punitive damages fund and the optimization of the rules such as group litigation system provide a guarantee for the punitive compensation system to be applicable to large-scale spam infringement.

关 键 词：垃圾信息 大规模侵权 惩罚性赔偿 集团诉讼 惩罚性赔偿基金 

分 类 号：D922.296[政治法律—经济法学] D922.294[政治法律—法学]