检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董振川 刘长睿 罗保林 尚金光[1,2] 白晓明 DONG Zhenchuan;LIU Changrui;LUO Baolin;SHANG Jinguang;BAI Xiaoming(Chengdu Institute of survey and Investigation,Chengdu 610081,China;Sichuan Province Urban Informationization Engineering Technology Research Center,Chengdu 610081,China;School of Earth Sciences and Environmental Engineering,Southwest Jiaotong University,Chengdu 611756,China)
机构地区:[1]成都市勘察测绘研究院,四川成都610081 [2]四川省城市信息化工程技术研究中心,四川成都610081 [3]西南交通大学地球科学与环境工程学院,四川成都611756
出 处:《城市勘测》2023年第6期78-82,共5页Urban Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying
基 金:四川省测绘地理信息学会科技开放基金资助课题(CCX202216)。
摘 要:通过架站式三维激光扫描、无人机倾斜摄影测量与无人机机载LiDAR扫描三种新型测量方法获取同一区域内建筑的点云数据以及三维模型绘制该区域内建筑的平面图。以全站仪及RTK获取的建筑特征点作为参考,分别对三种方法获得的平面图进行差异统计,综合对比分析三种方法各自优缺点。The point cloud data of buildings and the planimetric map of the buildings in the same area were obtained by three new surveying methods:stationary 3D laser scanning,drone-based oblique photogrammetry,and drone-based LiDAR scanning.The building characteristic points obtained by the total station and RTK were used as references,and the differences between the planimetric maps obtained by the three methods were statistically analyzed(including planimetric and elevation results).The advantages and disadvantages of the three methods were comprehensively compared and analyzed to complete the feasibility analysis of using airborne LiDAR for building completion surveying.
分 类 号:P225.2[天文地球—大地测量学与测量工程] P631[天文地球—测绘科学与技术]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.138.170.222