检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:罗龙泉 任琳[2] 林玉芳[3] 高建中[1] LUO Longquan;REN Lin;LIN Yufang;GAO Jianzhong(College of Economics&Management,Northwest A&F University,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China;Party Committee Office,Shaanxi Taibai Mountain National Nature Reserve Management Bureau,Yangling,Shaanxi 712100,China;Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering,Yan an Vocational&Technical College,Yan an,Shaanxi 716000,China)
机构地区:[1]西北农林科技大学经济管理学院,陕西杨凌712100 [2]陕西太白山国家级自然保护区管理局党委办公室,陕西杨凌712100 [3]延安职业技术学院机电工程系,陕西延安716000
出 处:《林业经济问题》2023年第3期250-259,共10页Issues of Forestry Economics
基 金:国家林业和草原局软科学研究项目(JYCL-2020-00036)。
摘 要:以京津风沙源治理二期工程为例,采用随机效应模型和中介效应模型,分析研究了新一轮退耕还林对农户收入和消费的影响以及对消费的影响机制。结果表明:新一轮退耕还林显著增加农户总收入和经营性收入,但未显著改善农户收入结构;新一轮退耕还林显著增加农户总消费、基础性消费和生产性消费,但未显著优化农户消费结构;新一轮退耕还林通过增加农户收入这一中介变量对农户消费产生作用,经济效益显而易见。为进一步巩固退耕还林成果,政府应因地制宜提高补贴标准、整合细碎土地、推进林权改革、引导和鼓励农户多渠道增收与就业,内外双联动提升农民生活水平。⑴Background——As a significant ecological safeguard measure,the new round of returning farmland to forests project is of great ecological significance for ecological protection in Beijing and Tianjin.However,as a policy measure involving the withdrawal of farmers cultivated land,whether it can guarantee the continuous increase of farmers income and the stability of farmers consumption is more worthy of discussion.⑵Methods——Based on the micro-panel data of 1115 farmers from 223 rural households in the“Beijing-Tianjin Sandstorm Source Treatment Project Monitoring”project from 2013 to 2017,this paper used the random effect model and the mediating effect model to study the impact of the new round of returning farmland to forests on the rural households income and consumption and the effect mechanism on the rural households consumption.⑶Results——The new round of returning farmland to forests significantly increased the total family income of the rural households,and had a significant positive impact on the total family income and operational income of the rural households at the level of 10%.However,the new round of returning farmland to forests did not improve the income structure of the rural households,and did not significantly affect the wage income,property income and transfer income of the rural households.The factors such as the farmers education level and the number of migrant workers had a significant positive impact on the wage income.Overall,the income of the rural households was still dominated by operational income.The new round of returning farmland to forests significantly increased the total family consumption of the rural households,especially the basic consumption and productive consumption.However,there was no significant increase in children s education consumption,medical consumption and interpersonal communication consumption,which also indicated that the consumption structure of the rural households was still in basic consumption.The new round of returning farmland to forest
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.161