多普勒非对称空间外差仪探测高层大气风速的三种方法比较研究  

A comparative study of three methods to detect the upper atmospheric wind speed by DASH

作　　者：李文文 惠宁菊 李存霞[1] 刘洋河 方妍 李凌青 王彦龙 唐远河[1] Li Wen-Wen;Hui Ning-Ju;Li Cun-Xia;Liu Yang-He;Fang Yan;Li Ling-Qing;Wang Yan-Long;Tang Yuan-He(School of Science,Xi’an University of Technology,Xi’an 710048,China)

机构地区：[1]西安理工大学理学院,西安710048

出　　处：《物理学报》2023年第24期123-132,共10页Acta Physica Sinica

基　　金：国家自然科学基金(批准号:41975040);陕西省自然科学基金(批准号:2020JZ-46,2021JQ-469)资助的课题。

摘　　要：采用多普勒非对称空间外差仪(Doppler asymmetric spatial heterodyne,DASH)被动遥感探测高层大气风速,目前有傅里叶级数法和流行的傅里叶变换两种测风方法.本文提出“四强度法”测风.比较研究了傅里叶级数法、傅里叶变换法和“四强度法”测风的原理、正演、噪声和反演等内容,3种测风方法均从DASH斐索干涉条纹的相位差变换而来.假设风速为0—100 m/s,利用傅里叶级数法、傅里叶变换法和“四强度法”得到正演的斐索干涉图后,再对应得到正演风速的误差分别为2.93%,4.67%和3.00%.人为添加均值为0、标准差为0.1的高斯噪声后,假设风速是0—100 m/s,用傅里叶级数、傅里叶变换和“四强度法”分别对平场后的数据正演,得到相对误差对应分别为2.30%,11.66%,2.27%.人为添加高斯噪声后,假设风速为31—39 m/s和30.1—30.9 m/s,用傅里叶级数法和“四强度法”得到正演风速值,两种情况的傅里叶级数法的测风误差是3.55%和4.15%,均高于“四强度法”的测风误差2.20%和2.69%.利用GBAII-DASH野外拍摄西安上空98 km的O(1S)557.7 nm气辉,得到天顶角为0°和45°的成像干涉图,再用傅里叶级数、傅里叶变换和“四强度法”得到反演风速分别为32.21 m/s,43.55 m/s和32.17 m/s.从DASH的正演、反演结果看,本文提出的“四强度法”探测高层大气风速的结果较好,计算简便,测风精度相对较高.The DASH(Doppler asymmetric spatial heterodyne)is used to detect the upper atmospheric wind speed by its imaging Fizeau interference fringes.There are two wind measurement methods:Fourier series method(FSM)and popular Fourier transform method(FTM).However,the wind speed measurement accuracy of FTM is greatly influenced by window function,and the calculation is relatively complicated.The Four-point algorithm(FPA)for DASH’s wind speed measurement is proposed in this paper.The contents of wind speed measurement principle,forward modeling,noise and inversion by the FSM,FTM and FPA are wholly compared and studied.The three wind speed measurement methods are all derived from the phase difference transformation of DASH Fizeau interference fringes.The Fizeau interference fringes with wind speed of 0-100 m/s at the interval of 10 m/s are simulated,and the forward wind speeds are obtained by FSM,FTM and FPA,and the corresponding wind measurement errors are 2.93%,4.67%and 3.00%,respectively.After artificially adding Gaussian noise with a mean value of 0 and a standard deviation of 0.1,FSM,FTM and FPA are used to forward the Fizeau interference fringes after flat field,and the corresponding relative errors are 2.30%,11.66%and 2.27%,respectively.After artificially adding Gaussian noise,the Fizeau interference fringes of wind speeds of 31-39 m/s with 1 m/s interval and 30.1-30.9 m/s with 0.1 m/s interval are simulated,and the forward wind speeds are obtained by FSM and FPA.In both cases,the wind speed measurement errors of FSM are 3.55%and 4.15%higher than those of FPA.The O(^(1)S)557.7 nm airglow at peak altitude of 98 km in Xi’an was photographed by using our GBAII(ground based airglow imaging interferometer)-DASH,and the imaging interferograms with zenith angles of 0°and 45°were obtained.Then by the methods of Fourier series,Fourier transform and FPA are used to obtain the inversion wind speed of 32.21 m/s,43.55 m/s and 32.17 m/s,respectively.From the forward and inversion results of DASH,we can see that the FPA has a

关 键 词：非对称空间外差光谱仪 “四强度法” 傅里叶变换 测风 

分 类 号：P407[天文地球—大气科学及气象学]