检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:鲍任兵 徐健 杜敬 刘赛 陈鹏 雷培树 汪博飞 BAO Renbing;XU Jian;DU Jing;LIU Sai;CHEN Peng;LEI Peishu;WANG Bofei(Central and Southern China Municipal Engineering Design&Research Institute Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430010,China;Wuhan Urban Drainage Development Co.,Ltd.,Wuhan 430070,China;CITIC Oingshui River
机构地区:[1]中国市政工程中南设计研究总院有限公司,湖北武汉430010 [2]武汉市城市排水发展有限公司,湖北武汉430070 [3]中信清水入江<武汉>投资建设有限公司,湖北武汉430200 [4]中信工程设计建设有限公司,湖北武汉430014
出 处:《净水技术》2023年第12期80-87,共8页Water Purification Technology
基 金:湖北省建设科技计划项目:双碳背景下城镇污水处理厂强化脱氮除磷工艺技术研究。
摘 要:在冬季低温(9~13℃)和进水低C/N条件下,分别以改良Bardenpho工艺与多级AO工艺进行试验,探究水量负荷率为100%、130%和150%下两种工艺对污染物的去除效果,并在工艺原理、设计要点和建设运行成本等方面进行对比分析,并提出两种工艺的适用条件。结果表明,在相同的水力停留时间(HRT)下,多级AO工艺对TN有更好的去除效果,而对于COD_(Cr)、氨氮和TP,两者去除性能无较大差异;在建设和运行成本上,多级AO工艺可节省约11.43%的总占地面积和20%的运行电耗,但需要配套精确曝气系统才能发挥其节能优势。Under the conditions of low temperature(9~13℃)in winter and low C/N influent,the modified Bardenpho process and multilevel AO process were tested respectively to compare the pollutant removal effects under water load rates of 100%,130%and 150%.The process principle,design points,construction and operation costs were compared and analyzed,and the applicable conditions of the two processes were put forward.The results showed that under the same hydraulic residence time(HRT),multi level AO process had better removal effect on TN,but there was no significant difference in the removal performance of COD_(Cr),ammonia nitrogen and TP.In terms of construction and operation costs,multi level AO could save about 11.43%of the total land occupation and 20%of the operation power consumption,but it needed to be equipped with a precise aeration system to give full play to its energysaving advantages.
关 键 词:改良Bardenpho工艺 多级AO工艺 强化脱氮 多点进水 碳源投加
分 类 号:X703[环境科学与工程—环境工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.188.100.195