尿沉渣显微镜法、尿干化学分析仪与全自动尿沉渣分析仪单独及联合进行尿液有形成分检测的性能评价比较  

Comparison of Performance Evaluation of Urine Sediment Microscopy,Urine Dry Chemistry Analyzer,and Fully Automated Urine Sediment Analyzer for Detection of Urine Sediment Components,Single or Combined

作　　者：洪瑞真 翁宝川[1] HONG Rui-zhen;WENG Bao-chuan(Xiamen Third Hospital,Fujian Xiamen 361000)

机构地区：[1]厦门市第三医院,福建厦门361000

出　　处：《中国医疗器械信息》2023年第23期112-115,共4页China Medical Device Information

摘　　要：目的:评价尿沉渣显微镜法(离心镜检法)、尿干化学分析仪(试带法)与全自动尿沉渣分析仪(Sysmex UF1000i)单独及联合进行尿液有形成分检测的性能比较。方法:选取2020年1月~2022年12月本院收集的80例尿液样本,对单独及联合检测的诊断效能进行分析。结果:以显微镜检测结果为“金标准”,其中红细胞阳性56例,阴性24例;白细胞阳性61例,阴性19例;透明管型阳性58例,阴性22例;3种方法联合检测结果高于单一检测结果(P<0.05)。结论:对尿液有形成分采用尿沉渣显微镜法、尿干化学分析仪与全自动尿沉渣分析仪联合检测准确性更高。Objective:To evaluate the performance comparison of urine sediment microscopy(centrifugoscopy),urine dry chemistry analyzer(test strip method),and fully automated urine sediment analyzer(Sysmex UF-1000i)for the detection of urine sediment components,both individually and in combination.Methods:80 urine samples collected from our hospital from January 2020 to December 2022 were selected to analyze the diagnostic efficacy of individual and combined testing.Results:Using microscope detection results as the“gold standard”,56 cases were positive for red blood cells and 24 cases were negative;61 cases were positive for white blood cells and 19 cases were negative;58 cases were positive for transparent tube type and 22 cases were negative;The combined detection results of the three methods were higher than those of a single detection(P<0.05).Conclusion:The combination of urine sediment microscopy,urine dry chemistry analyzer,and fully automated urine sediment analyzer is more accurate in detecting visible components in urine.

关 键 词：尿沉渣显微镜法 尿干化学分析仪 全自动尿沉渣分析仪 尿液有形成分 

分 类 号：R446.1[医药卫生—诊断学]